Thermal performance, drying kinetics, and thin-layer model evaluation of a cocoa pod husk briquette-assisted passive solar dryer

Main Article Content

Clement Adesoji Ogunlade
Ademola Kabir Aremu
Babatunde Olayinka Oyefeso
Victoria Oluwabunmi Fasiku

Abstract

Inadequate drying rates and weather dependency remain significant postharvest challenges in conventional solar drying of cocoa (Theobroma cacao L.). This study evaluated the thermal performance, drying kinetics, and thin-layer drying model goodness-of-fit of a passive hybrid solar dryer utilizing cocoa pod husk (CPH) briquettes as a renewable auxiliary heat source. Drying trials were conducted under three operating configurations: solar-only, hybrid solar–biomass, and biomass-assisted drying. Temperature, relative humidity, and sample weight were recorded at 30-minute intervals, and dimensionless moisture ratios were fitted to thirteen empirical and semi-empirical thin-layer drying models using nonlinear regression. Model suitability was evaluated using the coefficient of determination (R2), sum of squared errors (SSE), and root mean square error (RMSE). The hybrid solar–biomass mode established superior thermal performance, generating the highest mean maximum chamber temperature (59.70+1.06oC) and system drying efficiency (57.80%). While solar-only drying achieved 56+2.83% moisture reduction over an extended period of 25 h (average drying rate of 0.011 kg/h), the hybrid and biomass-assisted modes reached comparable moisture reduction (51.00+1.41% and 50%, respectively) in only 7 h at an accelerated rate of 0.036 kg/h. Among the evaluated models, the Hii model exhibited the best overall fit under solar and hybrid drying regimes (R2 up to 0.9988, with correspondingly low SSE and RMSE values). The results demonstrate that incorporating CPH briquettes into a passive solar dryer provides effective thermal supplementation, substantially accelerates moisture removal, and promotes circular agricultural waste utilization in cocoa postharvest operations.

Article Details

How to Cite
1.
Ogunlade CA, Aremu AK, Oyefeso BO, Fasiku VO. Thermal performance, drying kinetics, and thin-layer model evaluation of a cocoa pod husk briquette-assisted passive solar dryer. Ag Bio Eng [Internet]. 2026 Oct. 28 [cited 2026 Oct. 31];3(4):131-43. Available from: https://ph04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/abe/article/view/16247
Section
Original Articles

References

[1] Ogunwa KI, Uchechukwu TO, Akaranta O. Cocoa processing residues in a circular bioeconomy: integrated valorization pathways, applications, and future perspectives. Journal of Agriculture and Environment for International Development. 2026;120(1):5-36. https://doi.org/10.36253/jaeid-20177.

[2] Attah EY, Onalo SM, Obi-Anike HO, Ndubuisi-Okolo PU. Institutional reforms, agricultural export diversification, and resilience to external shocks: A pathway to sustainable growth in Nigeria. Development and Sustainability in Economics and Finance. 2025;8:100095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsef.2025.100095.

[3] Kehinde A, Ojo T, Tijani A. The impact of European Union (EU) Sanitary and phytosanitary standards (sps) on cocoa supply chain in Nigeria. Discover Food. 2026;6:349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44187-026-01048-y.

[4] Oyefeso BO, Ogunrinde JA, Ogunlade CA. Effect of different drying methods on selected quality attributes of Okra (Abelmoschus esculentus L.). FUOYE Journal of Engineering and Technology. 2024;9(2):11–21. https://doi.org/10.4314/fuoyejet.v9i2.2.

[5] Owolarafe OK, Falana OB, Olagunju TM, Bamidele L, Atoyebi AA, Ogunlade CA. Study on the drying characteristics of fermented locust bean seeds: effect on proximate composition. Eurasian Journal of Food Science and Technology. 2025;9(2):53-68.

[6] Nongmaithem SC, Singh CN, Gupta KK, Singamayum FN, Subith CS, Ganga K, Pradhan RC, Dwivedi M. Cocoa neo-formed contaminants: forming mechanism, processing effects on nutritional and impacts on human neurological system. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 2026;66(15):2791-807. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2025.2587678.

[7] Costa PRDN, Silveira MDS, Do Vale JC, Sousa PHMD. Bean‐to‐Bar chocolate: an integrative framework linking terroir, biochemistry, processing, and sensory expression. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety. 2026;25(3):e70515. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.70515.

[8] Ogundare OA, Ibitoye O, Oyewole OS, Oke O, Ogungbemi K. Evaluation of the quality characteristics of cocoa bean dried using different drying techniques. Innovare Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2022;10(5):8-11. https://doi.org/10.22159/ijags.2022.v10i5.46510.

[9] Oyefeso BO, Aremu AK, Fasiku VO, Ogunlade CA. Development of a passive hybrid solar dryer for cocoa bean. Journal of Agricultural Mechanization. 2025;5(1):66-79. https://doi.org/10.63749/agrimech.5.1.1007w.

[10] Umron A, Muchammad M, Tony Suryo Utomo MSK, Fudholi A, Suyono T. Review of drying technologies for food products: methods, innovations, and optimization. Engineering Headway. 2026;38:181-9. https://doi.org/10.4028/p-8lLLxC.

[11] Rashid FL, Hammoodi KA, Al Maimuri NM, Abdalrahem MK, Ameen A, Mohammed HI, Bouabidi A. Performance evaluation, simulation, and mathematical modeling of biomass–solar drying systems: a systematic review. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry. 2026;151:7301-30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-026-15550-z.

[12] Donkor D, Tulashie SK, Helegah F, Baidoo EB, Alale EM, Holdbrook DA, Lartey-Qel SK, Opoku EK, Felitse EF, Alem DA. Cocoa byproduct utilization in the bioeconomy: a review of waste-to-resource strategies. Biofuels. 2026;17(4):756-83. https://doi.org/10.1080/17597269.2025.2550911.

[13] Ogunlade CA, Jekayinfa SO, Oyedele OJ, Olajire AS, Oladipo AO. Drying parameters of wild lettuce (Lactuca taraxaxifolia L) affected by different drying methods. Croat J Food Sci Technol. 2023;15(1):1-8. https://doi.org/10.17508/CJFST.2023.15.1.13.

[14] Gohain RJB, Phukon C, Dutta PP, Baruah MG. Performance evaluation, kinetic modeling, and quality assessment of a solar‐biomass hybrid dryer for drying Elaeagnus caudata. Journal of Food Process Engineering. 2026;49(4):e70501. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpe.70501.

[15] Akpojaro J, Oyeyemi M. Performance evaluation of a prototype solar dryer against the conventional sun. drying system in Nigeria. Current Journal of Applied Science and Technology. 2020;9(4):411-8. https://doi.org/10.9734/BJAST/2015/16308.

[16] Association of Official Analytical Collaboration (AOAC). Official methods of Analysis. William Horwitz, editor 17th Edition, The Association of Official Analytical Chemist, Gaithersburg, M.D, USA methods. 2000.

[17] Raviteja G, Champawat PS, Jain SK, Chavan S. Drying characteristics of mint leaves in tray dryer. International Journal of current Microbiology and Applied Sciences. 2019;8(3):543-51. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcmas.2019.803.066.

[18] Oyefeso BO, Abdulganiy OR. Effect of thickness and pre-treatment on drying kinetics of cocoyam. AgricEngInt: CIGR. 2020;22(2):160-6.

[19] Omobowale M, Akhere EO, Okoro NE. Performance evaluation of the dehytray solar drying device using plantain, pepper and okra under the tropical condition of Oyo state, Nigeria. Journal of stored products and postharvest Research. 2021;12(2):20-41.

[20] Robert JS, David RK, Olga P. Drying kinetics of grapes seeds. Journal of Food Engineering. 2008;89:460-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2008.05.030.

[21] Shittu T, Raji A. Thin layer drying of African breadfruit (Treailia africana) seeds. Chemistry, Food and Bioprocess Technology. 2011;4:224-31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11947-008-0161-z.

[22] Doymaz I, Ismail O. Drying characteristics of sweet cherry. Food and Bioproducts Processing. 2011;89(1)31-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fbp.2010.03.006

[23] Corzo O, Bracho N, Alvarez C. Determination of suitable thin layer model for air drying of mango slices (Mangifera indica L.) at different air temperatures and velocities. Journal of Food Process Engineering. 2011;34(2):332-50. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4530.2009.00360.x.

[24] Ademiluyi T, Oboho EO, Owudoge M. Leonardo. Electronic Journal of Practices and Technologies. 2008;7(13): 47-62.

[25] Kingsly AR, Balasubramaniam VM, Rastogi NK. Effect of high pressure processing on texture and drying behaviour of pineapple. Journal of Food Process Engineering. 2009;32(3):369-81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-4530.2007.00221.x.

[26] Kumar S, Nambi E, Shiva N, Uma S. Thin layer drying kinetics of Banana var. Monthan (ABB): influence of convective drying. Journal of Food Processing Engineering. 2019;42(3):213020. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfpe.13020.

[27] Da Silva WP, e Silva CM, Gama FJ, Gomes JP. Mathematical models to describe thin-layer drying and to determine drying rate of whole bananas. Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences. 2014;13(1):67-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssas.2013.01.003.

[28] Midilli A, Kucuk H, Yapar Z. A new model for single-layer drying. Drying Technology. 2002;20(7):1503-13. https://doi.org/10.1081/DRT-120005864.

[29] Vega A, Fiko P, Andres A, Lemus R. Mathematical modeling of hot air drying kinetics of red bell pepper. Journal of Food Engineering. 2007;79(4):1460-1466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2006.04.028.

[30] Demir V, Gunhan T, Yagcioglu AK. Mathematical modeling of convection drying of green table olives. Biosystem Engineering. 2007;98(1):47-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2007.06.011.

[31] Hii CL, Law CL, Cloke M. Modeling using a new thin layer drying model and product quality of cocoa. Journal of Food Engineering. 2009;90(2):191-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2008.06.022.

[32] Hanumantrao PS. Investigation on solar dryer assisted with agro-residue briquette based hot air generator. Doctoral dissertation, Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh Krishi Vidyapeeth. 2018.

[33] Barzigar A, Hosseinalipour SM, Mujumdar AS. Toward sustainable post-harvest practices: A critical review of solar and wind-assisted drying of agricultural produce with integrated thermal storage systems. Drying Technology. 2025;43(10):1463-94. https://doi.org/10.1080/07373937.2025.2542440.

[34] Santander M, Chica V, Correa HAM, Rodríguez J, Villagran E, Vaillant F, Escobar S. Unravelling cocoa drying technology: A comprehensive review of the influence on flavor formation and quality. Foods. 2025;14(5):721. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods14050721.

[35] Saha B. Development of shrinkage drying model for prediction of changes in quality indicators during drying of fruits and vegetables. Doctoral dissertation: UNSW Sydney. 2019.

[36] Suherman S, Sinuhaji TRF, Hadiyanto H, Asy-Syaqiq MA, Anggoro DD, Prasetiyono BW, Sugiharto HE, Setiadi A. Photovoltaic–silica-assisted hybrid solar drying stages and procedures of cacao beans. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry. 2026;151:11265-89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-026-15767-y.

[37] Hii CL. A review on the technological evolution and advancements of cocoa dryers. Drying Technology. 2025;43(1-2):130-46. https://doi.org/10.1080/07373937.2024.2440008.

[38] Ogunlade CA, Aremu AK. Energy consumption pattern as affected by machine operating parameters in mechanically expressing oil from Pentaclethra macrophylla: modeling and optimization. Cleaner Engineering and Technology. 2021;5:100300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clet.2021.100300.

[39] Kusuma HS, Paradiba H, Wahyuni TD, Amenaghawon AN, El Messaoudi N, Darmokoesoemo H. Comparison of thin-layer drying models for microwave drying of peanuts at varying power levels. Food and Humanity. 2025;5:100754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foohum.2025.100754.

[40] Ling J, Xu J, Heldman DR, Wu T. Prediction of moisture content and energy consumption in microwave drying of beef based on an optimized SSA-BP model. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering. 2025;18(4):312-20. https://doi.org/10.25165/j.ijabe.20251804.9832.

[41] Kaur S, Singh L, Singh V. Comparative modeling of muskmelon seed drying in tray and vibro-fluidized bed systems. Journal of Food Science and Technology. 2025:1-14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197-025-06507-5.

[42] Lichinga KN, Sikazwe K, Elibariki R, Masse AA, Kayumba HI, Shija H. Cleaner cooking solutions: Optimizing biomass briquettes to replace charcoal and mitigate climate change in Tanzania. Scientific African. 2025;30:e03056. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sciaf.2025.e03056.