RISK ANALYSIS OF THE AMANAH CENTER BUILDING CONSTRUCTION PROJECT USING THE BOWTIE METHOD

Authors

  • Hafnidar A. Rani Department of Civil Engineering, Universitas Muhammadiyah Aceh
  • Rahimi A. Rahman Faculty of Civil Engineering Technology, Universiti Malaysia Pahang, Kuantan, Malaysia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8042-0392
  • Muhammad Zakki Department of Civil Engineering, Universitas Muhammadiyah Aceh, Banda Aceh, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55766/sujst9139

Keywords:

Risk analysis, Construction project, Bowtie method, Probability impact matrix

Abstract

Building construction projects face uncertainties that may affect time, cost, and quality goals. This study aims to identify, categorize, and analyze the dominant risks in the Amanah Center Building Project in Ladong Village, Aceh Besar, using the Bowtie method. The Amanah Center is a large-scale project with a total area of 14,646 m², which is susceptible to various risks. The risk factors analyzed include labor risks, contractual risks, design and technology risks, execution risks, material and equipment risks, and force majeure risks. Data were collected through interviews and surveys with project stakeholders, and risks were assessed using a probability-impact matrix on a 1-5 Likert scale. The results show that design changes represent the highest risk factor, with a mean value of 3.19, indicating frequent occurrence. The probability impact matrix further reveals that design and technology risks, particularly design changes, pose a moderate-risk level (score 9.19), which in practice may cause delays of up to two weeks and cost increases of around 10% of affected activities. The Bowtie analysis identifies two key top events: (1) design and technology risks, leading to delays and rework, mitigated through design review and schedule adjustments; and (2) material and equipment risks, associated with poor material quality and price escalation, mitigated through supplier diversification and procurement planning. This study not only provides valuable insights into project risk management but also offers practical recommendations for project managers, emphasizing stricter design review processes and more resilient procurement strategies.

References

Anbarasu, N. A., Keshav, L., Raja, K. C. P., & Sivakumar, V. (2024). Unraveling the flexural behavior of concrete and compare with innovative fea investigations. Matéria (Rio de Janeiro), 29(4), e20240656. https://doi.org/10.1590/1517-7076-RMAT-2024-0656

Anbarasu, N. A., Sivakumar, V., Yuvaraj, S., Veeramani, V., & Velusamy, S. (2025). Pioneering the next frontier in construction with high-strength concrete infused by nano materials. Matéria (Rio de Janeiro), 30, e20240730. https://doi.org/10.1590/1517-7076-RMAT-2024-0730

Ancione, G., Paltrinieri, N., & Milazzo, M. F. (2020). Integrating Real-Time Monitoring Data in Risk Assessment for Crane Related Offshore Operations. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 8(7), 532. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse8070532

Annamalai, K., Anbarasu, N. A., Govindarajan, B. P., & Sivarethinamohan, S. (2025a). Sustainable concrete: integrating environmentally friendly materials for environmentally friendly construction. Matéria (Rio de Janeiro), 30, e20250239. https://doi.org/10.1590/1517-7076-RMAT-2025-0239

Annamalai, K., Sampathkumar, S., Kachancheeri, M. S., Padmanaban, M., Ayyanar, O., & Anbarasu, N. A. (2025b). Exploring the role of recycled aggregates in modern concrete technology. Matéria (Rio de Janeiro), 30, e20250033. https://doi.org/10.1590/1517-7076-RMAT-2025-0033

Aven, T. (2016). Risk assessment and risk management: Review of recent advances on their foundation. European Journal of Operational Research, 253(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.12.023

Celik, B. G., Abraham, Y. S., & Attaran, M. (2024). Unlocking blockchain in construction: A systematic review of applications and barriers. Buildings, 14(6), 1600. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14061600

De Ruijter, A., & Guldenmund, F. (2016). The bowtie method: A review. Safety Science, 88, 211-218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2016.03.001

Elizabeth, R. M. C., Sattari, F., Lefsrud, L., & Gue, B. (2025). Visualizing what’s missing: Using deep learning and Bow-Tie diagrams to identify and visualize missing leading indicators in industrial construction. Journal of Safety Research, 93, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsr.2025.02.007

Fajrisa, D., Hariyono, W., & Sulistyawati, S. (2024). Workplace accident risk analysis using the bowtie method in the construction industry: a literature review. Jurnal eduHealt, 15(01), 546-556.

Fernandez-Muniz, B., Montes-Peon, J. M., & Vazquez-Ordas, C. J. (2018). The role of safety leadership and working conditions in preventing workplace accidents in the construction industry. Journal of Safety Research, 66, 51-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2017.11.001

Fernández-Valderrama, P., Ureña-Estrella, C., Moyano, J., & Bienvenido-Huertas, D. (2024). Cost and time risk factors in construction projects in the Dominican Republic. Frontiers in Built Environment, 10, 1307572. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2024.1307572

Fraume, M-C.M., Cardona, A.O-D., Fraume, P.M., Carreño, T.M-L., & Barbat, A.H. (2020). Evaluating risk from a holistic perspective to improve resilience: The United Nations evaluation at global level. Safety Science, 127, 104739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104739

Gunduz, M., Naji, K.K., & Al-Marri, H. (2025). Factors driving construction material price volatility in Qatar’s construction industry: An investigation using Generalized Structured Component Analysis (GSCA). Buildings, 15(9), 1475. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15091475

Han, Y., Chen, M., Li, N., Ji, M., & Wang, X. (2025). Digital twin in construction safety management: Recent advances, challenges, and future directions from 4M1E perspective. Safety Science, 192, 107006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2025.107006

Khakzad, N., Khan, F., and Amyotte, P. (2012). Dynamic risk analysis using bow-tie approach. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 104, 36-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2012.04.003

Kien, D.T., Ortiz, R.V.C., Özker, A.N., Safla, E.R.P., Misnan, M.S., and Phorah, K. (2025). Digital twin technology for real-time risk management in industrial IOT systems. Journal of Information Systems Engineering and Management, 10(53s), 1124-1133.

Kiral, I.A. (2025). Contextual evaluation of risk identification techniques for construction projects: Comparative insights and a decision-support model. Buildings, 15(20), 3806. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings15203806

Kumar, K.S., & Narayanan, R.M. (2021). Review on construction risk and development of risk management procedural index – A case study from Chennai construction sector. Materials Today: Proceedings, 43(2), 1141-1146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.08.606

Kumi, L., Jeong, J., & Jeong, J. (2024). Systematic review of quantitative risk quantification methods in construction accidents. Buildings, 14(10), 3306. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14103306

McLeod, R.W., & Bowie, P. (2018).Bowtie analysis as a prospective risk assessment technique in primary healthcare.Policy and Practice in Health and Safety, 16(2), 177-190. https://doi.org/10.1080/14773996.2018.1466460

Montero, V.J., Logrosa, G., Calorio, J.L., Lato, J.I., Hassall, M., & Mata, M.A. (2025). Risk modeling with Bowtie method for decision-making towards public health and safety. Safety Science, 185, 106777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2025.106777

Nguyen, H.D, & Macchion, L. (2023). A comprehensive risk assessment model based on a fuzzy synthetic evaluation approach for green building projects: the case of Vietnam. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 30(7), 2837-2861. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-09-2021-0824

Project Management Institute. (2025). A guide to the project management body of knowledge (PMBOK® guide) (8th ed.). Project Management Institute. https://www.pmi.org/pmbok-guide-standards/foundational/pmbok

Rajapakshe, W. (2025). Critical risk factors influencing the management of disruptions in construction projects: Insights from recent challenges in Sri Lanka. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 12, 101748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101748

Rani, H.A., Amin, J., Ayob, A., & Al Rahmatillah, D. (2022). Risk probability of time and cost on building construction project: A Monte Carlo simulation. Journal of Innovation and Technology, 3(2), 60-68.

Rani, H.A. (2025). Manajemen Risiko Proyek Konstruksi (Construction Project Risk Management). Indonesia: Deepublish.

Rani, H.A., Amin, J., Syuhada, R., Mubarak, M.H., & Aqsha, M.S. (2024a). Enhancing supply chain management risk mitigation: A house of risk methodology applied to brick manufacturing in Aceh Besar Regency. Qeios. https://doi.org/10.32388/FSJF2F.2

Rani, H.A., Syammaun, T., Azzahra, F., Ayob, A., Amlus, M.H., Zakirullah, Z., & Aqsha, M.S. (2024b). Risk management planning by risk register in building construction project. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1303(1), 012034. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1303/1/012034

Sajeev, P.S., Rajagopal, V.S.G., and Arasu, N. (2025). Investigation of concrete durability enhancement using supplementary cementitious materials. MethodsX, 15, 103527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2025.103527

Sari, D.P., Pujotomo, D., & Wardani, N.K. (2017). Risk analysis using AS/NZS 4360:2004, Bow-Tie diagram and ALARP on construction projects of Banyumanik Hospital. AIP Conf. Proc., 1902, 020013. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5010630

Singh, P., van Gulijk, C., & Sunderland, N. (2024). The BowTie as a digital twin: How a BowTie looks different from a data perspective. Safety, 10(2), 34. https://doi.org/10.3390/safety10020034

Szymański, P. (2017). Risk management in construction projects. Procedia Engineering, 208, 174-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.11.036

Tokdemir, O.B., Erol, H., and Dikmen, I. (2019). Delay risk assessment of repetitive construction projects using line-of-balance scheduling and monte carlo simulation. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 145(2), 04018122. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001595

Waqar, A., Khan, A.M., & Othman, I. (2024). Blockchain empowerment in construction supply chains: Enhancing efficiency and sustainability for an infrastructure development. Journal of Infrastructure Intelligence and Resilience, 3(1), 100065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iintel.2023.100065

Yussif, A-M., Taiwo, R., Shakor, P., Han, T., Mohandes, S.R., Antwi-Afari, M.F., Qazi, K., Singh, A.K., Christo, M.S., & Shah, M.A. (2025). A comprehensive literature review on risk identification and assessment in green building construction projects. Cleaner Engineering and Technology, 29, 101089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clet.2025.101089

Downloads

Published

2026-05-05

How to Cite

Rani, H. A., Rahman, R. A., & Zakki, M. (2026). RISK ANALYSIS OF THE AMANAH CENTER BUILDING CONSTRUCTION PROJECT USING THE BOWTIE METHOD . Suranaree Journal of Science and Technology, 33(1), 010406(1–13). https://doi.org/10.55766/sujst9139