DEVELOPMENT OF INTERLOCKING BLOCKS FOR CONSTRUCTION IN SALINE AREAS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55766/sujst7086Keywords:
Compressive Strength, Construction Materials, Interlocking Blocks, Saline SoilAbstract
This research focuses on developing interlocking blocks for construction in saline environments, which present challenges due to the corrosive effects of salt on conventional building materials. The study aims to improve the durability and compressive strength of interlocking blocks by optimizing ratios of Type 1 and Type 5 portland cement, combined with laterite soil and water. Tests were conducted to evaluate the blocks’ performance, particularly their resistance to saline soil and compressive strength, across 7, 14, 21, and 28 days. The findings reveal that blocks with higher proportions of Type 5 cement exhibited enhanced resistance to salinity, while Type 1 cement contributed to greater compressive strength. The optimal mix (2.5:2.5 ratio of Type 1 and Type 5 cement) provided both high compressive strength and superior salinity resistance, making it suitable for construction in saline environments. The study emphasizes the potential of these improved interlocking blocks for sustainable use in regions with saline soil, extending the lifespan of structures built in such areas.
References
Aiamsri, K. (2021). Mechanical properties of soil-cement modified with natural rubber latex at different temperatures (Master's thesis, Suranaree University of Technology).
Alaloul, W.S., John, V.O., and Musarat, M.A. (2020). Mechanical and thermal properties of interlocking bricks utilizing wasted polyethylene terephthalate. International Journal of Concrete Structures and Materials, 14(1):8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40069-020-00399-9
Al-Fakih, A., and Al-Osta, M.A. (2022). Finite element analysis of rubberized concrete interlocking masonry under vertical loading. Materials, 15(8):2858. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15082858
Al-Fakih, A., Mohammed, B.S., Liew, M.S., and Alaloul, W.S. (2018). Physical properties of the rubberized interlocking masonry brick. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 9(6):656-664.
Al-Fakih, A., Mohammed, B.S., Wahab, M.M.A., Liew, M.S., Amran, Y.H.M., Alyousef, R., and Alabduljabbar, H. (2020). Characteristic compressive strength correlation of rubberized concrete interlocking masonry wall. Structures, 26:169-184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2020.04.010
Chaiyaphanna, P., and Hemathulin, N. (2022). Improvement of Hnong-Han soil with natural rubber and cement suitable for highway material. In The 27th National Convention on Civil Engineering (NCCE-27), Chiang Rai, Thailand.
Joyklad, P., Waqas, H.A., Hafeez, A., Ali, N., Ejaz, A., Hussain, Q., Khan, K., Sangthongtong, A., and Saingam, P. (2023). Experimental investigations of cement clay interlocking brick masonry structures strengthened with CFRP and cement-sand mortar. Infrastructures, 8(3):41. https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures8030059
Korking, Y. (2019). Construction and embodied energy rammed building. Journal of Architecture, Design and Construction, 1(3):22-31.
Manuwadee, S. (1989). Salinity. Marine Science Institute, Chulalongkorn University.
Mohammed, B.S., Liew, M.S., Alaloul, W.S., Al-Fakih, A., Ibrahim, W., and Adamu, M. (2018). Development of rubberized geopolymer interlocking bricks. Case Studies in Construction Materials, 8:401-408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2018.03.007
Segar, D.A. (1998). Introduction to ocean sciences. Wadsworth Pub.
Xie, G., Zhang, X., Hao, H., Bi, K., and Lin, Y. (2022). Response of reinforced mortar-less interlocking brick wall under seismic loading. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 20(13):6129-6165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-022-01436-6
