EXPLORING FACTORS AFFECTING NITROGEN ISOLATION BY CATION EXCHANGE MEMBRANE AND THEIR IMPLICATIONS FOR MICROBIAL FUEL CELL PERFORMANCE IN WASTEWATER TREATMENT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55766/sujst-2024-02-e05287Keywords:
Cation exchange membrane, microbial fuel cell, nitrogen isolation, wastewater treatmentAbstract
This study explores the utilization of a cation exchange membrane (CEM) in a microbial fuel cell (MFC) system to isolate nitrogen from wastewater influents. While employing a CEM in an MFC system has drawbacks, such as increased internal resistance and reduced power output, it also provides a means for optimal energy recovery from organics while allowing isolated nitrogen to be treated in subsequent steps. This study evaluated the diffusion of ammonium through CEM in a dual-chamber MFC under different operating conditions. Results indicated that the MFC reactor with CEM as a separator isolated 88-93% of the nitrogen input, demonstrating the feasibility of this approach for nitrogen separation in wastewater treatment applications. Factors affecting nitrogen isolation, including COD input at the anode, dissolved oxygen (DO) at the cathode, and external resistance (ER), are identified. Higher COD input at the anode and the DO at the cathode were found to enhance nitrogen separation, while increased ER had an adverse effect on nitrogen isolation capacity. Additionally, changes in the surface characteristics of the CEM during operation could impact nitrogen isolation, emphasizing the need for careful monitoring and maintenance of the CEM to ensure consistent performance over time. In conclusion, this study highlighted the potential of using a CEM in MFC systems for nitrogen isolation, provided insights into the factors affecting the efficacy of nitrogen separation, and underscored the need for monitoring and maintenance of the CEM. These results could significantly impact the development of more efficient and sustainable wastewater treatment using the MFC system.
References
Baird, R.B., Eaton, A.D. and Rice, E.W. (2017). Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. 23rd Edition, American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, Water Environment Federation, Washington D.C.
Jin, X., Guo, F., Ma, W., Liu, Y., Liu, H. (2019). Heterotrophic anodic denitrification improves carbon removal and electricity recovery efficiency in microbial fuel cells. Chemical Engineering Journal, 370:527-535.
Jin, X., Yang, N., Liu, H., and Wang, S. (2022). Membrane penetration of nitrogen and its effects on nitrogen removal in dual-chambered microbial fuel cells. Chemosphere, 297:134038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022. 134038.
Lu, H., Oehmen, A., Virdis, B., Keller, J., and Yuan, Z. (2006). Obtaining highly enriched cultures of Candidatus Accumulibacter phosphates through alternating carbon sources. Water Research, 40(20):3838-3848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2006.09.004
Nguyen, H.D. and Babel, S. (2022). Insights on microbial fuel cells for sustainable biological nitrogen removal from wastewater: A review. Environmental Research, 204(part B):112095. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2021.112095.
Nguyen, H.D. and Babel, S. (2023a). A novel coupled microbial fuel cell operation for organic and nitrogen removal with simultaneous energy recovery from wastewater. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 55:102981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seta.2022.102981.
Nguyen, H.D. and Babel, S. (2023b). Unraveling and enhancing the power recovery and nitrogen removal mechanism from wastewater by isolating input nitrogen in a coupled microbial fuel cell system, Environmental Research, 231(part 1):116027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres. 2023.116027
Nguyen, H.D. and Babel, S. (2024). Bioelectricity recovery through isolation and removal of nitrogen from wastewater by shortcut nitrification-denitrification in a coupled microbial fuel cell system. Fuel. 359:130497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2023.130497
Ren, Y., Lv, Y., Wang, Y., and Li, X. (2020). Effect of heterotrophic anodic denitrification on anolyte pH control and bioelectricity generation enhancement of bufferless microbial fuel cells. Chemosphere, 257:127251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.127251
Rozendal, R.A., Hamelers, H.V.M., and Buisman, C.J.N. (2006). Effects of membrane cation transport on pH and microbial fuel cell performance. Environmental Science & Technology, 40(17):5206–5211. https://doi.org/10.1021/ es060387r.
Santoro, C., Arbizzani, C., Erable, B., and Ieropoulos, I. (2017). Microbial fuel cells: From fundamentals to applications. A review. Journal of Power Sources, 356:225–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2017.03.109.
Virdis, B., Rabaey, K., Yuan, Z., and Keller, J. (2008). Microbial fuel cells for simultaneous carbon and nitrogen removal. Water Research, 42(12):3013–3024. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.watres.2008.03.017.
Virdis, B., Read, S.T., Rabaey, K., Rozendal, R.A., Yuan, Z., and Keller, J. (2011). Biofilm stratification during simultaneous nitrification and denitrification (SND) at a biocathode. Bioresource Technology, 102(1):334-341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2010.06.155
Yoshitake, M., Tamura, M., Yoshida, N., and Ishisaki, T. (1996). Studies of perfluorinated ion exchange membranes for polymer electrolyte fuel cells. Denki Kagaku Oyobi Kogyo Butsuri Kagaku, 64:727-736. https://doi.org/ 10.5796/kogyobutsurikagaku.64.727
