STRATIFIED FOLDED RANKED SET SAMPLING FOR ASYMMETRIC DISTRIBUTIONS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55766/sujst-2024-04-e03604Keywords:
Folded Ranked Set Sampling, Ranked Set Sampling, Simple Random Sampling, Stratified Folded Ranked Set SamplingAbstract
This study evaluates the comparative efficiency of Stratified Folded ranked set sampling (SFRSS) in estimating the population mean against three other sampling methods: Simple Random Sampling (SRS), Stratified Simple Random Sampling (SSRS), and Random Sampling (RSS). The analysis spans various probability distributions, Exp(1), Geo(0.5), Gamma, Weibull, Log N(0,1), CHI(1). The results show that SFRSS outperforms or remains competitive with the other sampling methods, especially in simpler conditions (r=2), across a wide range of distributions. For instance, in the Exponential and Geometric distributions, SFRSS demonstrates superior efficiency at r=2, indicating its effectiveness in less complex scenarios. Similarly, for the Gamma and Weibull distributions, SFRSS maintains high efficiency at r=2, showcasing its adaptability and robustness in various conditions. Notably, in the Log-Normal distribution at r=5, SFRSS’s efficiency dramatically improves against SSRS, suggesting its particular suitability for skewed data under certain conditions. Additionally, SFRSS exhibits exceptional efficiency in the Chi-Square distribution at r=2, underscoring its effectiveness across diverse statistical landscapes. However, at the more complex condition (r=5), although the efficiency of SFRSS generally decreases, it still competes closely with SRSS and outperforms SSRS in certain cases, retaining its relevance and demonstrating a degree of adaptability to complex scenarios. This comprehensive analysis highlights the importance of selecting appropriate sampling strategies based on the study’s distribution characteristics and conditions. SFRSS emerges as a highly efficient method for estimating population means, particularly in less complex scenarios, and remains a competitive choice in more demanding conditions. The findings underscore the potential of SFRSS in optimizing estimation accuracy across various statistical distributions and study designs, affirming its value in statistical research and applications.
References
Al-Omari, A.I. and Bouza, C.N. (2014). Review of ranked set sampling: Modifications and applications. Revista Investigacion Operacional, 35(3):215-235.
Bani-Mustafa, A.S., AL-Nasser, A, and Aslam M. (2011). Folded Ranked Set Sampling for Asymmetric Distributions. Communications of the Korean Statistical Society, 18(1):147-153. https://doi.org/10.5351/CKSS.2011.18.1.147
Cochran, W.G. (1977). Sampling Techniques (3rd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Dell, T.R. and Clutter, J.L. (1972). Ranked Set Sampling Theory with Order Statistics Background. International Biometric Society, 28(2):545-555. https://doi.org/10.2307/2556166
Levy, P.S. and Lemeshow, S. (2008). Sampling of Populations: Methods and Applications (4th ed.). Wiley-Interscience. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470374597
Matthews, M.J. and Wolfe, D.A. (2017). Folded Ranked Sampling. Statistics & Probability Letters, 112(C):173-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spl.2016.11.015
McIntyre, G.A. (1952). A Method for Unbiased Selective Sampling Using Ranked Sets. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 3(4):385-390. https://doi.org/10.1071/AR9520385
McIntyre, G.A. (2005). A Method for Unbiased Selective Sampling Using Ranked Set. The American Statistician, 59(3):230-232. https://doi.org/10.1198/000313005X54180
Mustafa, A.B., Al-Nasser, A.D., and Aslam, M. (2011). Folded Ranked Set Sampling for Asymmetric Distributions. Communications of the Korean Statistical Society, 18(1):147-153. https://doi.org/10.5351/CKSS.2011.18.1.147
Muttlak, H.A. and McDonald, L.L. (1990). Ranked set sampling with size-biased probability of selection. International Biometric Society, 46(2):435-445. https://doi.org/10.2307/2531448
Samawi, H.M. (1996). Stratified ranked set sample, Pakistan Journal of Statistics, 12(1):9-16.
Stokes, S.L. (1980). Estimation of variance using judgement post-stratification. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 75(370):320-330. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1980.10477469
Stokes, S.L. and Sager, T.W. (1988). Characterization of a ranked-set sample with application to estimating distribution functions. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83(402):374-381. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1988.10478607
Takahasi, K. and Wakimoto, K. (1968). On Unbiased Estimates of the Population Mean Based on the Sample Stratified by Means of Ordering. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics, 20(1):1-31. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02911622
Thompson, S.K. (2012). Sampling (3rd ed.). Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118162934
Wolfe, D.A. (2004). Ranked set sampling: An approach to more efficient data collection. Statistical Science, 19(4):636-643. https://doi.org/10.1214/088342304000000369








