INVESTIGATION OF FABRIC TACTILE CHARACTERISTICS FOR DIFFERENT CLOTHING BASED ON ELDERLY PERSPECTIVES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55766/sujst-2023-04-e02413Keywords:
Elderly, Sorting Task, Fabric Properties, Sensorial ComfortAbstract
Thailand has an aging society which is affected by the social and economic dimensions of the country. Products and services for the well-being of the elderly are becoming very competitive markets. This study investigated Thai elderly preferences toward apparel fabrics. In total, 40 Thai elderly women were interviewed on their purchasing behavior relating to clothing and their attitudes to different types of fabric. The free sorting task method was applied to 28 fabric samples based on their suitability for different applications by elderly people. The results showed that the factors influencing apparel purchasing by the elderly were price, tactile properties, and apparel pattern design. The elderly considered sensorial comfort, breathability, and softness as important components of good quality in a fabric for well-being. The sorting task produced 6 groups. The sleeping wear group was associated with all knitted fabrics and related to soft and stretched textures that provided comfort, while loungewear had a high association with the fabrics made of linen fiber based on the descriptive words ‘soft’, ‘comfort’, ‘airy’, ‘natural’, and ‘stiff’. Business professional wear had a high association with fabrics made of silk, linen, and cotton based on the descriptive words ‘thick’, ‘stiff’, and ‘look expensive’. These findings could provide guidelines for designing and manufacturing fabrics whose characteristics match the demands of the elderly, as well as guiding the fabrics to use to create clothing providing well-being for the elderly.
References
Alimma, D., Matsio, T., Nakajima, M., and Takahashi, T. (2000). Sensory measurements of the main mechanical parameters of knitted fabrics. Textile Research Journal, 70:985-990. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/004051750007001109
Bishop, D.P. (1996). Fabrics: sensory and mechanical properties. Textile Progress, 26(3):1-6. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00405169608688866
Brand, R.H. (1964). Measurement of fabric aesthetics analysis of aesthetic components. Textile Research Journal, 34:791-804. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/004051756403400909
Bumphrey, E.E., and Stevens, B.M. (1981). Dressmaking for the Disabled (2nd ed.). London: The College of Occupational Therapists.
Cardello, A.V., Winterhalter, C., and Schutz, H.G. (2003). Predicting the handle and comfort of military clothing fabrics from sensory and instrument data: development and application of new psychophysical methods. Textile Research Journal, 73:221-237. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/004051750307300306
Chollakup, R., Schacher, L., Sinoimeri, A., and Adolphe, D.C. (2005). Influence of silk/cotton blend proportion and blending techniques on the tactile feeling of knitted fabrics. Journal of Text. Apparel, 9(3):71-79. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/RJTA-09-03-2005-B011
Chollakup, R., Sinoimeri, A., Philippe, F., Schacher, L., and Adolphe, D. (2004). Tactile sensory analysis applied to silk/cotton knitted fabrics. Inter. Journal Clothing Sci. Tech, 16:132-140. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/09556220410520423
Cieielska-Wrobel, I.L., and Langenhove, L.V. (2012). The hand of textiles-definitions, achievement, perspective-a review. Textile Research Journal, 82(14):1,457-1,468. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0040517512438126
Civitci, S.S. (2004). An ergonomic garment design for elderly Turkish men. Applied Ergonomics, 35(3):243-51. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2004.02.001
Goldsworthy, M. (1981). Clothes for disabled people. London: B.T. Batsford Ltd.
Hatch, L.K. (1993). Textile Science. West Publishing Company, MN, USA, 472p.
Hoffman, A.M. (1979). Clothing for handicapped, the aged, and other people with special needs. Springfield: Charles C. Thomas Publisher LTD.
Jacobsen, M., Fritz, A., Dhingra, R., and Postle, R. (1992). A psychological evaluation of the tactile qualities of hand knitting yarns. Textile Research Journal, 62:557-566. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/004051759206201001
Kawabata, S. (1980). The Standardization and Analysis of Hand Evaluation (2nd ed.). The textile Machinery Society of Japan, Osaka.
Kawabata, S., and Niwa, M. (1989). Fabric performance in clothing and clothing manufacture. Journal of Textile Institute, 80:19-50. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00405008908659184
Kawabata, S., and Niwa, M. (1991). Objective measurement of fabric mechanical property and quality: its application to textile and clothing manufacture. International Journal of Clothing Science and Technology, 3:7-18. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/eb002968
Mahar, TJ., Wang, H., and Postle, R. (2013). A review of fabric tactile properties and their subjective assessment for next-to-skin knitted fabrics. Journal of Textile Institute, 104:572-589. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00405000.2013.774947
Phoophat, P., Sukigara, S., and Yamamoto, H. (2018). "Cross-material" Texture Perception: An Exploratory Analysis of Woven Fabrics and Tree Barks. Journal of Textile Engineering, 64(1):11-18. Doi: https://doi.org/10.4188/jte.64.11
Phoophat, P., Yamamoto, H., and Sukigara, S. (2019). Visual aesthetic perception of handwoven cotton fabrics. The Journal of The Textile Institute, 110(3):412-425. DOI: 10.1080/00405000.2018.1531460. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00405000.2018.1531460
Smathers D.G. and Horridge P.E. (1978). The Effects of Physical changes on Clothing Preferences of Elderly women. Aging and Human Development, 9(3):273-278. Doi: https://doi.org/10.2190/BPTM-FFJ5-Y0FQ-Q47J
Thorton, N. (1990). Fashion for disabled people. London: B.T. Batsford Ltd.
Twigg, J. (2007). Clothing, age and the body: A critical review. Ageing and Society, (2):285-305. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X06005794
Zhu, Y., Zeng, X. Koehl, L., Lageat, T., Charbonneau, A. and Chaigneau, C. (2010). A general methodology for analyzing fashion oriented textile products using sensory evaluation. Food Qual and Pref, 21:1,068-1,076. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2010.07.014
