A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ORTHOGONAL PLANES FOR DIFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS OF BRAIN TUMOR LESIONS THROUGH MRI

Authors

  • Smitha Haridas Department of Physics, Noorul Islam Centre of Higher Education, Kumarakovil, Kanyakumari, Tamil Nadu & Department of Physiology, Sree Gokulam Medical College & Research Foundation, Venjaramoodu.P.O, Trivandrum.
  • Meena Devi Vimala kumari Nagendra Prasad Departments of Physics, Noorul Islam Centre of Higher Education, Kumarakovil, Kanyakumari, Tamil Nadu.
  • Vinoo Jacob Department of Radio Diagnosis, Sree Gokulam Medical College & Research Foundation, Venjaramoodu.P.O, Trivandrum-695607.
  • Sreekanth Kavitha Sivaraman Department of Biochemistry, Sree Gokulam Medical College & Research Foundation, Venjaramoodu.P.O, Trivandrum-695607.

Keywords:

Brain tumor, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Axial, Sagittal, Coronal, Tumor Volume

Abstract

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) is a sensitive tool, for differential diagnosis of normal as well as abnormal structures of internal organs. MRI provides superior structural characterization by capturing the cellular, vascular, metabolic and functional properties for differential diagnosis of brain tumors by measuring volume, axial, sagittal and coronal planes through two dimensional slices. The aim of the study is to characterize and identify the orthogonal imaging planes to detect brain tumor lesions through MRI. This study included 69 patients, both males and females, suspected of brain lesions and underwent MRI for diagnosis. The variations in the volume of the anatomical structures were measured and compared the planes as axial/sagittal, axial/coronal and coronal/sagittal for tumor brain lesions. The present study revealed that there is difference in the measurement of volume in tumor lesions in orthogonal planes (axial, sagital and coronal). It was found that the volume of axial planes is measured as larger volume than the sagittal and coronal planes in tumor lesions. Statistical Analysis was done by SPSS version 16 software. The quantitative variables were expressed in mean and standard deviation (SD). Two way/Friedman Test were used for comparing the three groups. Statistically there was a significant diiference between coronal and axial planes. From this study it is concluded that, in most of the brain lesions irrespective of the type of tumors, axial planes helps more in the detection of tumor volume as compared to sagittal and coronal planes for precise diagnosis of brain lesions.

References

Amboina, R.D., Wang P., and O'Dell WG. (2010). Computer-aided detection of metastatic brain tumors using automated three-dimensional template matching. J. Magn Reson Imaging., 31(1):85-93.

Chaudhary, V. and Bano, S. (2011). Imaging of the pituitary: Recent Advances. Indian J Endocrinol Metab., 15 (3):S216-S223.

Gao, K., Ma, H., Cui, Y., Chen, X., Ma, J., Dai, J., and Herholz, K. (2015). Meningiomas of the cerebellopontine angle: radiological differences in tumors with internal auditory canal Involvement and their influence on surgical outcome. PLoS ONE., 10(4):1-11.

Gates, A.R., Huang, C.L., Crowle, J.J., Gresham. A., Shapiro.L.M., Carpenter, T.A., and Hall, L.D. (1994). Magnetic resonance imaging planes for the 3-dimensional characterisation of human coronary arteries. J. Anat., 185:335-346.

Hou, Z., Wu, Z., Zhang, J., Zhang, L., Tian,R., and Liu,B. (2012). Lateralventricular subependymomas: An analysis of the clinical features of 27 adult cases at a single institute Neurology India., 60(4):379-384.

Jacobs, M.A., Ibrahim, T.S., and Ouwerkerk, R., (2007). MR imaging: brief overview and emerging applications AAPM/RSNA physics tutorials. RadioGraphics., 27(4):1213-1229.

Javier, E., Marc Mabray, V.M.C., and Cha, S. (2017). Current clinical brain tumor imaging. Neurosurgery., 81(3):397-415.

Kanazawa, T., Ohkubo, M., Kondo, T., and Niigata, J.P. (2017) Measurement of thin slice thickness in MRI using an improved wedge method. Euroepean Society of Radiology., 10:446-453.

Karpagam, B., and Vadanika, V. (2015). Brain space occupying lesions by magnetic resonance imaging: a prospective study. Int. J. Scien. Study., 3(8):123-127.

Lavra, F., Scartozzi, M., Zaccagn, F., Cartocci, G., and Luca Saba. (2017). Advanced magnetic resonance imaging in the study of primary intracranial brain tumorsin adults: a state of art review. J. Xiangya Medicine:1-21.

Longmore, D.B. (1989). The principles of magnetic resonance. British Medical Bulletin., 45(4):848-880.

Lyndon, D., Lansley, J.A., Evanson, J., Krishnan, A.S. (2019). Dural masses: meningiomas and their mimics. Insights Imaging., 10(1):1-22.

Mabray, M.C., Barajas, R.F., and Cha,S. (2015). Modern brain tumor imaging. Brain Tumor Research and Treatment., 3(1):8-23.

Mahmoudzadeh, A.P. and Kashou, N.H. (2014). Interpolation-based super-resolution reconstruction: effects of slice thickness. J Medical Imaging., 1(3):1-9.

McKean, D., Yoong, P., and Mc Carthy, M.C.L. (2015). A guide to magnetic resonance imaging in clinical practice british. J. hospital medicine., 76(4):C55-C59.

McMahon, K.L., Cowin, G, and Galloway G. (2011). Magnetic resonance imaging: the underlying principles. J. Orthop Sports Phys Ther., 41(11):806-19.

Menze, B.H., Jakab A., Bauer S., Kalpathy-Cramer J., Farahani K., Kirby J., Burren Y., Porz N., Slotboom J., Wiest R., Lanczi L., Gerstner E., Weber MA., Arbel T., Avants BB., Ayache N., Buendia P., Collins DL., Cordier N., Corso JJ., Criminisi A., Das T., Delingette H., DemiralpC., Durst CR., Dojat M., Doyle S., Festa J., Forbes F., Geremia E., Glocker B., Golland P., Guo X., Hamamci A., Iftekharuddin KM., Jena R., John NM., Konukoglu E., Lashkari D., Mariz JA., Meier R., Pereira S., Precup D., Price SJ., Raviv TR., Reza SM., Ryan M., Sarikaya D., Schwartz L., Shin HC., Shotton J., Silva CA., Sousa N., Subbanna NK., Szekely G., Taylor TJ., Thomas OM., Tustison NJ., Unal G., Vasseur F., Wintermark M., Ye DH., Zhao L., Zhao B., Zikic D., Prastawa M., Reyes M., and Van Leemput K. (2015). The multimodal brain tumor image segmentation benchmark (BRATS). IEEE Trans Med Imaging., 34(10):1993-2024.

Misaki M., Savitz J., Zotev V., Phillips R., Yuan H., Young KD., and Drevets WC. (2015) Bodurka J. Contrast enhancement by combining T1-and T2-weighted structural brain MR Images. Magn Reson Med., 74(6):1,609-20.

Nayak, B.K., Desai, S., and Maheshwari, S. (2013). Interpretation of magnetic resonance imaging of orbit: simplified for ophthalmologists (Part I). J. Clinical Ophthalmology and Research., 1(1): 29-35.

Onwu, O.S., Dada O.M., and Awojoyogbe, O.B. (2014). Physics and mathematics of magnetic resonance imaging for nanomedicine: An overview. World J. Transl Med., 3(1):17-30.

Paek, S.L., Chung, Y.S., Paek, S.H., Hwang, J.H., Chul-Ho Sohn, C.H., Son, Y.D., Kim, Y.B., Kim, D.G., Lee, K.H., and Cho, Z.H. (2013). Early Experience of Pre-and Post-Contrast 7.0T MRI in Brain Tumors. The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences. J. Korean Med Sci., 28(9):1362-1372.

Park, J.S., Chung, M.S., Park, H.S., Shin, D.S., Har, D.H., Cho, Z.H., Kin, Y.B., Han, J.Y., and Chi, J.G. (2010). A proposal of new reference system for the standard axial, sagittal, coronal planes of brain based on the serially-sectioned images. J. Korean Med Sci., 25(1):135-141.

Provenzale, J.M., Ison, C., and De Long, D. (2009). Bidimensional Measurements in Brain Tumors: Assessment of Interobserver Variability. Neuroradiology/Head and Neck Imaging American J. Roentgenology., 193(6):W515-W522.

Rajasekaran, K.A. and Gounder, C.C. (2018). Advanced Brain Tumor Segmentation from Tumor Segmentation from MRI Images. High Resolution Neuroimaging-Basic Physical principles and Clinical Applications. Intech Open

Shah, G.D., Kesari, S., Xu, R., Batchelor, T.T., O’Neill, A.M., Hochberg, F.H., Levy, B., Bradshaw, J., Wen, P.Y. (2006). Comparison of linear and volumetric criteria in assessing tumor response in adult high grade gliomas. Neuro-oncol., 8(1):38-46.

Smitha, H., Devi, M.V.N., Jacob, V., and Sivaraman, S.K. (2020). Evaluation of signal intensity for differential diagnosis of brain lesions in MRI. Int. J. Scien. and Technol. Research., 9(4):2,840-2,844.

Watts, J., Box, G., Galvin, A., Brotchie, P., Trost, N., and Sutherland, T. (2014). Magnetic resonance imaging of meningiomas: a pictorial review. Insights Imaging., 5(1):113-122.

Yadav, P., Jantre, M., and Thakkar, D. (2015). Magnetic resonance imaging of cerebellopontine angle lesions., 8(6):751-759.

Zivadinov, R., Banas, A.C., Yella, V., Abdelrahman, N., Guttman, W.B., and Dwyer, M.G. (2008). Comparison of three different methods for measurement of cervical cord atrophy in multiple sclerosis. Am J. Neuroradiol., 29(2):319-325.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-28

How to Cite

Haridas, S., Devi Vimala kumari Nagendra Prasad, M., Jacob, V., & Kavitha Sivaraman, S. (2026). A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF ORTHOGONAL PLANES FOR DIFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS OF BRAIN TUMOR LESIONS THROUGH MRI. Suranaree Journal of Science and Technology, 29(2), 070038(1–7). retrieved from https://ph04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/SUJST/article/view/15099

Issue

Section

Research Article