MULTI-CRITERIA DECISION SUPPORT OF PROJECT RISK ASSESSMENT
Keywords:
Risk assessment, AHP, WPM, multi-criteria decision analysis, project RisksAbstract
Risk is an inherent property of each project, because a project life cycle is subjected to different nature’s risks, such as internal or external origins. The aim of this paper is to rank the pipeline installation project construction’s risks in order of importance, taken into account the two multi-criteria approaches of decision support which are Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Weighted Product Model (WPM). The project construction’s risks have been estimated using the cost, delay and quality criteria. The weighted criticality of each risk was determined according to the project characteristics, the probability of occurrence, aggregate impact and the non-detectability factor.
References
Al-Subhi Al-Harbi, K.M. (2001). Application of AHP in project management. Int. J. Project Manag., 19(1):19-27.
Anna, E.W. and Wojciech, K. (2019). Multi-criterial analysis of oversize cargo transport through the city, using the AHP method. Trans. Res. Proc., 39:614-623.
Badri, A., Nadeau, S., and Gbodossou, A. (2012). Proposal of a risk-factor-based analytical approach for integrating occupational health and safety into project risk evaluation. Acc. Anal. Prev., 48:223-234.
Ben Romdhane, T., Ben Ammar, F., and Badreddine, A. (2007). Une approche par la logique floue pour l’optimisation multicritère de la prise de décision appliquée à l’AMDEC. J. Dec. Sys., 16(4):505-544.
Brebbia, C.A. (2014). Risk analysis ΙΧ. WIT press., ISBN: 978-1-84564-792-6.
Company Blog. (2018). Sonatrach Business Blog. Available from: www.sonatrach-dz.com/sonatrach-business-blog. Accessed date: Feb 18, 2018.
Devatha, C.P. and Kumar T.A. (2019). Prioritizing cropping alternatives based on attribute specification and comparison using MADM models. J. Saudi Soc. Agricul. Sci., 18:337-343.
Forman, E.H. and Selly, M.A. (2000). Decision by Objectives: How to Convince Others that you are Right, Pre-publication book.
Jolanta, T., Edmundas, K.Z., and Zenonas, T. (2013). Multi-criteria risk assessment of a construction project. Procedia Comp. Sci., 17:129-133.
Kanyarat, Ph., Bunthit, W., Worarat, K., and Suree, F. (2017). Rankings of the security factors of human resources information system (HRIS) influencing the open climate of work: using analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Procedia Comp. Sci., 111:287-293.
Kolios, A., Mytilinou, V., Minguez, E.L., and Saloniti K. (2016). A comparative study of multiple-criteria decision-making methods under stochastic inputs. Ener., 9:566.
Kumar, A. and Dash, M.K. (2016). Fuzzy optimization and multi-criteria decision making in digital marketing. Business science reference., ISBN : 978-1-14666-8808-7.
Lichtenstein, S. and Newman, J.R. (1967). Empirical scaling of common verbal phrases associated with numerical probabilities. Psychon. Sci., 9(10):563-564.
Marle, F. (2012). A multi-criteria decision-making process for project risk management method selection. Int. J. Multicri. Dec. Mak., 2(2).
Nahal, M. and Khelif, R. (2019). Numerical model for estimating time-dependent reliability of a corroding pipeline over its lifetime. Int. J. Adv. Struct. Eng., 11:1-7.
Saaty, T.L. and Kearns, K.P. (1991). Analytical planning: the organization of systems. The analytic hierarchy process series, vol. 4, RWS Publications Pittsburgh, USA.
Singh, J. and Harwinder, S. (2018). Strategic implementation of continuous improvement approach, improving the performance of small and medium-sized entreprises. Springer Brief in Operations Management., ISBN: 978-3-319-93120-3.
Skibniewski, M.J. and Chao, L. (1992). Evaluation of advanced construction technology with AHP method. J. Construc. Eng. Manage., ASCE, 118(3):577-593.
Wang, Y.M., Liu, J., and Elhag, M.S. (2008). An integrate AHP-DEA methodology for bridge risk assessment. Comp. Indus. Eng., 54:513-525.








