A NON-DESTRUCTIVE PNEUMATIC APPROACH FOR MEASURING INNER ROUNDNESS OF MILLIMETER-SCALE METAL SLEEVES

Authors

  • Pensiri Tongpadungrod Department of Production Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, King Mongkut’s University of Technology North Bangkok, 1518 Pracharat 1 Road, Bangsue, Bangkok 10800, Thailand.
  • Wiwat Maneekongkla Department of Production Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, King Mongkut’s University of Technology North Bangkok, 1518 Pracharat 1 Road, Bangsue, Bangkok 10800, Thailand.
  • Chantaraporn Phalakornkule Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, King Mongkut’s University of Technology North Bangkok, 1518 Pracharat 1 Road, Bangsue, Bangkok 10800, Thailand.

Keywords:

Inner roundness, motor sleeve, pneumatic measuring device, peak to peak principle

Abstract

This research work presented a non-destructive pneumatic method for measuring the inner roundness of millimeter-scale metal sleeves. An air micrometer with 2 air jet outlets was placed inside a metal sleeve at the center of the sleeve. In an instant, the air jet nozzle injected an air jet stream toward the inner wall of the metal sleeve, yielding the distance between the air jet nozzle and the inner wall of the sleeve. The measured distances were converted to the inner diameter of the metal sleeve based on its cylindrical geometry. As the air jet nozzle rotated 360 degrees around the axis of the cylindrical sleeve sample, multipoint inner diameter data of the sleeve sample were collected. These diameters were used to construct the inner roundness of the sample using the peak to peak principle. In this study, the roundness of the metal sleeve samples was determined using the non-destructive pneumatic instrument and compared with those obtained by a commercial contact type roundness measuring instrument. The comparison showed good agreement (<10% difference) when a workpiece was conforming (roundness <1 μm). However, higher deviations were obtained when a workpiece was non-conforming (roundness >1 μm).

References

Adamczak, S., Świderski, J., and Kmiecik-Sołtysiak, U. (2017). Estimation of the uncertainty of the roundness measurement with a device with rotary spindle. Mechanik, 912-914. 10.17814/mechanik.2017.10.145.

Gao, W. and Kiyono, S. (1997). On-machine roundness measurement of cylindrical workpieces by the combined three-point method. Measurement, 21(4): 147-156.

Horikawa, O., Maruyama, N., and Shimada, M. (2001). A low cost high accuracy roundness measuring system. Precis. Eng., 25:200-205.

Janusiewicz, A., Adamczak, S., Makieła, W., and Stępień, K. (2011). Determining the theoretical method error during an on-machine roundness measurement. Measurement, 44(9):1,761-1,767.

Mekid, S. and Vacharanukul, K. (2011). In-process out-of-roundness measurement probe for turned workpieces. Measurement, 44(4):762-766.

Mohamed, A., Esa, A.H., and Ayub, M.A. (2011). Roundness measurement of cylindrical part by machine vision. Proceedings of the International Conference on Electrical, Control and Computer Engineering 2011 (InECCE); 21-22 June 2011; Pahang, Malaysia, p. 486-490.

Muralikrishnan, B., Venkatachalam, S., Raja, J., and Malburg, M. (2005) A note on the three-point method for roundness measurement. Precis. Eng., 29(2):257-260.

Reeve, C.P. (1979). The Calibration of a Roundness Standard. National Bureau of Standards, Washington, D.C., USA, 19p.

Sui, W.and Zhang, D. (2012). Four methods for roundness evaluation. Physcs. Proc., 24(C):2,159-2,164.

Sun, T.H. (2009). Applying particle swarm optimization algorithm to roundness measurement. Expert Syst. Appl., 36(2):3,428-3,438.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-28

How to Cite

Tongpadungrod, P., Maneekongkla, W., & Phalakornkule, C. (2026). A NON-DESTRUCTIVE PNEUMATIC APPROACH FOR MEASURING INNER ROUNDNESS OF MILLIMETER-SCALE METAL SLEEVES. Suranaree Journal of Science and Technology, 26(1), 51–58. retrieved from https://ph04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/SUJST/article/view/14541

Issue

Section

Research Article