ANALYSIS OF THE MOST INFLUENTIAL FACTOR ON QUALITY OF EXPERIENCE IN MOBILE NETWORK

Authors

  • Arisa Vilaikruad School of Telecommunication Engineering, Institute of Engineering, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima,30000, Thailand.
  • Peerapong Uthansakul School of Telecommunication Engineering, Institute of Engineering, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima,30000, Thailand.
  • Monthippa Uthansakul School of Telecommunication Engineering, Institute of Engineering, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima,30000, Thailand.
  • Patikorn Anchuen School of Telecommunication Engineering, Institute of Engineering, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima,30000, Thailand.
  • Damar Widjaja Universitas Sanata Dharma, Indonesia.

Keywords:

Quality of service (QoS), quality of experience (QoE), feed-forward backpropagation neural network, mean absolute deviation (MAD)

Abstract

As the quality of service (QoS) on mobile networks constantly changes, the communication service providers always examine and improve the network performance to maintain the number of customers. In terms of network optimization, communication service providers just focus on adjusting the QoS parameters to the standards of the mobile service but that does not approach the customers’ actual needs. The researchers recognize the importance of the QoS parameters along with the users' satisfaction or users’ experience which are evaluated using the principles of quality of experience (QoE). In this paper, the relationships among the parameters using model creation based on a feed-forward backpropagation neural network are presented. The same evaluator for all evaluations is utilized because the locations are alien in different environments. The activities for the evaluation of the users’ opinions consist of watching the YouTube service, using a web browser, and sending a message via the Line service. These relationships are analyzed to get the QoS parameters that have the most impact on changes of the QoE score using mean absolute deviation (MAD). This study can be used as a guideline for investigation and management of problematic parameters for communication service providers.

References

Anchuen, P., Uthansakul, P., and Uthansakul, M. (2016). QoE model in cellular networks based on QoS measurements using neural network approach. Proceedings of the IEEE 13th International Conference on Electrical Engineering/Electronics, Computer, Telecommunications and Information Technology (ECTI-CON); June 28-July 1, 2016; Chiang Mai, Thailand, p. 1-5.

Aroussi, S. and Mellouk, A. (2014). Survey on machine learning-based QoE-QoS correlation models. Proceedings of the IEEE 2014 International Conference on Computing, Management and Telecommunications (ComManTel); April 27-29, 2014; Da Nang, Vietnam, p. 200-204.

Belavkin, R.V. (2014). Feed Forward Neural Network. BIS3226. Available from: http://www.eis.mdx.ac. uk/staffpages/rvb/teaching/BIS3226/hand11.pdf. Accessed date:

Cisco Systems, Inc. (2017). Cisco Visual Networking Global Mobile Data Traffic Forecast Update, 2016–2021 White Paper. Available from: https:// www.cisco.com/c/en/us/solutions/collateral/servic e-provider/visual-networking-index-vni/mobile-white- paper-c11-520862.html. Accessed date: February 7, 2017.

Danish, E., Alreshoodi, M., Fernando, A., Alzahrani, B., and Alharthi, S. (2016). Cross-layer QoE prediction for mobile video based on random neural networks. Proceedings of the IEEE 2016 International Conference on Consumer Electronics (ICCE); Jan 7-11, 2016; Las Vegas, NV, USA, p. 227-228.

De Veaux, R.D. and Ungar, L.H. (1997). A brief introduction to neural networks. Available from: https://cis.upenn.edu/~ungar/papers/nnet-intro.ps. Accessed date:

Fritzke, B. (1994). Growing cell structures - a self-organizing network for unsupervised and supervised learning. Neural Networks, 7(9):1441-1460.

Ghalut, T., Larijani, H., and Shahrabi, A., (2015). Content-based video quality prediction using random neural networks for video streaming over LTE networks. Proceedings of the IEEE 2015 International Conference on Computer and Information Technology, Ubiquitous Computing and Communications, Dependable, Autonomic and Secure Computing, Pervasive Intelligence and Computing (CIT/IUCC/DASC/PICOM); Oct 26-28, 2015; Liverpool, UK, p. 1626-1631.

International Telecommunication Union. (2008a). E.800: Definitions of terms related to quality of service. International Telecommunication Union, Geneva, Switzerland.

International Telecommunication Union. (2008b). G.1080: Quality of experience requirements for IPTV services. International Telecommunication Union, Geneva, Switzerland.

International Telecommunication Union. (2008c). P.800.1: Mean opinion score (MOS) terminology. International Telecommunication Union, Geneva, Switzerland.

International Telecommunication Union. (2016). G.1011: Reference guide to quality of experience assessment methodologies. International Telecommunication Union, Geneva, Switzerland.

Pierucci, L. (2015). The quality of experience perspective toward 5G technology. IEEE Wirel. Commun., 22(4):10-16.

Psaltis, D., Sideris, A., and Yamamura, A.A. (1988). A multilayered neural network controller. IEEE Contr. Syst. Mag., 8(2):17-21.

Rahnema, M. (2008). RAN performance root cause analysis and trending techniques for effective troubleshooting and optimization. In: UMTS network planning, optimization, and inter-operation with GSM. Rahnema, M. John Wiley and Sons, Singapore, p. 299-300.

Rivera, S., Riveros, H., Ariza-Porras, C., Lozano-Garzon, C., and Donoso, Y. (2013). QoS-QoE correlation neural network modeling for mobile internet services. Proceedings of the IEEE 2013 International Conference on Computing, Management and Telecommunications (ComManTel); Jan 21-24, 2013; Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, p. 75-80.

Rojas, R. (1996). The backpropagation algorithm. In: Neural Networks. Rojas, R. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany, p.149-182.

Specht D.F. (1991). A general regression neural network. IEEE T. Neural Networ., (2)6:568-576.

Zaid, M.A. (2015). Correlation analysis. In: Correlation and Regression Analysis. Zaid, M.A. The Statistical, Economic and Social Research and Training Centre for Islamic Countries (SESRIC), Ankara, Turkey, p.4-8.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-28

How to Cite

Vilaikruad, A., Uthansakul, P., Uthansakul, M., Anchuen, P., & Widjaja, D. (2026). ANALYSIS OF THE MOST INFLUENTIAL FACTOR ON QUALITY OF EXPERIENCE IN MOBILE NETWORK. Suranaree Journal of Science and Technology, 25(2), 151–164. retrieved from https://ph04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/SUJST/article/view/14486

Issue

Section

Research Article