FACTOR ANALYSIS OF BIM ADOPTION IN THE THAI ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING DESIGN INDUSTRY

Authors

  • Grit Ngowtanasawan Construction Management Program, Faculty of Architecture, Urban Design, and Creative Arts, Mahasarakham University, 44150 Thailand.

Keywords:

BIM, adoption, architectural and engineering design, factor analysis

Abstract

Building information modelling (BIM) is a computer technology in the building and facilitydesign industry which is being adopted in many countries for implementing designprojects. The Thai architectural and engineering design industry is currently perceiving and adopting the changing design technology of BIM. Factors related to BIM adoptionbehaviours in the industry were studied, classified, and analysed using exploratory factoranalysis (EFA) statistical techniques. Empirical data were collected from 278 samples from Thai engineers and architects who were experienced in using BIM. The factors were classified by EFA into 4 groups and comprised 1) adopter characteristics, 2) BIMcharacteristics, 3) vendor characteristics, and 4) environmental characteristics. Results ledto the formulation, presentation, and discussion of a strategy to enhance BIM adoption in the Thai architectural and engineering design industry.

References

Barlish, K. and Sullivan, K. (2012). How to measure the benefits of BIM - A case study approach. Automat.Constr., 24:149-159.

Davis, F.D. (1985). Technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: theory and results, [ Ph.D. dissertation] .Sloan School of Management, MassachusettsInstitute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.

Hsu, C.C. and Sandford, B.A. (2007). The Delphi technique: making sense of consensus. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 12(10):1-8.

Kaiser, K.F. (1958). The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis. Psychometrika,23(3):187-200.

Norris, M. and Lecavalier, L. (2010). Evaluating the useof exploratory factor analysis in developmental disability psychological research. J. Autism Dev.Disord., 40(1):8-20.

Nunnally, J.C. (1978). Psychometric Theory. 2nd ed.McGraw-Hill, NY, USA, 701p.

Rogers, E.M. (2003). Diffusion of Innovations. 5th ed. FreePress, NY, USA, 550p.

Schiffman, L.G. Kanuk, L.L. (2004). Consumer Behavior.8th ed. Pearson Practice Mall, New Jersey, USA,587p.

Son, H. , Lee, S. , and Kim, C. ( 2015) . What drives the adoption of building information modeling indesign organizations? An empirical investigationof antecedents affecting architects’ behavioral intentions. Automat. Constr., 49:92-99.

Sorescu, A. B. , Chandy, R. K. , and Prabhu, J. C. ( 2003) .Sources and financial consequences of radical innovation: insights from pharmaceuticals. J.Marketing, 67(4):82-102.

Tabachnik, B.G. and Fidel, L.S. (2001). Using Multivariate Statistics. 4th ed. Allyn & Bacon Needham Heights, MA, USA, 966p.

Trott, P. (2008). Innovation Management and New Product Development. 4th ed. Pearson Education Limited, Harlow, UK, 648p.

Wikipedia. (2016). Awareness. San Francisco, CA, USA:The Wikimedia Foundation, Inc. Available from:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Awareness. Accessed date: Jan 1, 2016.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-28

How to Cite

Ngowtanasawan, G. (2026). FACTOR ANALYSIS OF BIM ADOPTION IN THE THAI ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING DESIGN INDUSTRY. Suranaree Journal of Science and Technology, 24(4), 415–422. retrieved from https://ph04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/SUJST/article/view/14403

Issue

Section

Research Article