FEASIBILITY STUDY ON USING FNA TO COMPLEMENT TNA IN LANDMINE DETECTION BY MONTE CARLO SIMULATION

Authors

  • Anan Sutcha School of Physics, Institute of Science, Suranaree University of Technology, 111 University Avenue, Muang District, Nakhon Ratchasima, 30000, Thailand.
  • Chinorat Kobdaj School of Physics, Institute of Science, Suranaree University of Technology, 111 University Avenue, Muang District, Nakhon Ratchasima, 30000, Thailand.
  • Worasit Uchai Faculty of Liberal Arts and Science, Nakhon Phanom University, 176 Moo 8, Ban Nern Sa-ad, Naratchakhwai Sub District, Muang District, Nakhon Phanom 48200, Thailand.

Keywords:

Monte Carlo simulation, TNT-landmine detection, fast neutron analysis, thermal neutron analysis

Abstract

MCNP5, a Monte Carlo computer code, is used to simulate the detection of TNT-landmines by using the technique of Fast Neutron Analysis (FNA) to complement Thermal Neutron Analysis (TNA).This technique utilizes a gamma ray detector to detect gamma rays induced from neutron interactions with the constituents of a TNT-landmine, H, C, O, and N, concurrently. The detection heads used in the simulation are composed of combinations of 2 isotopic neutron sources, 252Cf and241Am-9Be, and 3 gamma ray detectors, NaI, BGO, and LaBr3. One kg of TNT, buried under 3formation surfaces, sand, CaCO3, and clay at 5 cm, is used as the dummy landmine. Flux ratios of4 prominent gamma rays with energies of 2.22, 4.44, 6.13, and 10.83 MeV, which are induced fromH, C, O, and N, respectively, are estimated and compared with their corresponding concentration ratios of the TNT-landmine’s constituents. The estimated flux ratio between gamma rays induced from H and N based on using LaBr3 to detect a TNT-landmine buried under sand agree with their corresponding concentration ratios between H and N within their error limits. However, the same ratios based on using other gamma ray detectors to detect a TNT-landmine buried under sand do not agree with their corresponding concentration ratios. Nevertheless, they are close, being less than15% different. Other ratios of gamma ray fluxes induced from the TNT-landmine’s constituents based on using other types of detection heads do not agree with their corresponding concentration ratios. These results imply that the complementary FNA-TNA technique cannot be used to detect a1-kg TNT-landmine buried under a sand surface at 5 cm. However, the TNA technique which utilizes the detections of gamma rays induced from H and N concurrently should be able to detect such a landmine effectively.

References

Amgarou, K., Domingo, C.T., Bouassoule, T., and Fernandez, F. (2009). Monte Carlo simulation of the NaI(Tl) detector response to measure gold activated foils. Nucl. Instrum. Meth. B.,267:2944–2951.

Brooks, F.D., Drosg, M., Buffler, A., and Allie, M.S.(2004). Detection of anti-personnel landmines by neutron scattering and attenuation. Appl.Radiat. Isotopes, 61:27-34

Clifford, E.T.H., McFee, J.E., Ing, H., Andrews, H.R.,Tennant, D., Harper, E., and Faust, A.A. (2007).A militarily fielded thermal neutron activation sensor for landmine detection. Nucl. Instrum.Meth. A., 579:418-425

Faust, A.A. (2004). Feasibility of Fast Neutron Analysis (FNA) for Detection of BuriedLandmines. Final report BTI-04/60-30. Bubble Technology Industries Inc.,Chalk River, ON,Canada.

IAEA. (1999). Proceedings of the First Research Coordination Meeting on the Application ofNuclear Techniques to Anti-personnel Landmines Identification; November 23-26,1999; Zagreb,Croatia. IAEA/PS/RC-799.

IAEA. (2001). Proceedings of the Second Research Coordination Meeting on the Application ofNuclear Techniques to Anti-personnel Landmines Identification; September 11-14, 2001; StPetersburg, Russia. IAEA/PS/RC-799-2.

IAEA. (2003). Proceedings of the Final Research Coordination Meeting on the Application ofNuclear Techniques to Anti-personnel Landmines Identification; May 19-23, 2003; Vienna, Austria.

Maućec, M..and de Meijer, R. J. (2002). Monte Carlosimulations as a feasibility tool for non-metallicland-mine detection by thermal-neutron backscattering. Appl. Radiat. Isotopes, 56:837-846

Miri-Hakimabad, H., Vejdani-Noghreiyan, A., andPanjeh, H. (2007). Improving the moderatorgeometry of an anti-personnel landmine detectionsystem. Appl. Radiat. Isotopess, 66:606-611.

Monin, L. and Gallimore, A. (2002). The Devil’sGardens: A History of Landmines. PimlicoBooks, London, 234 p.

Orion, I. and Wielopolski, L. (2000). ResponseFunction of the BGO and NaI(T1) Detectors Using Monte Carlo Simulation. Ann.NY Acad.Sci., 904:271-275.

Vourvopoulos, G., Sullivan, R.A., Knapp, V., andHrupec, D. (2003). Evaluation of PELAN as confirmation sensor. In: EUDEM2-SCOT-2003,International Conference on Requirements and Technologies for the Detection, Removal and Neutralization of Landmines and UXO. Sahli,H., Bottoms, A.M., and Cornelis, J. (eds.),September 15-18,2003; Vrije Universiteit,Brussels, Belgium. p. 731-736.

X-5 Monte Carlo Team. (2003). MCNP-A GeneralMonte Carlo N-Particle Trans-port Code.,Version5, Technical Report, Los AlamosNational Lab-oratory, Los Alamos, NM, USA.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-28

How to Cite

Sutcha, A., Kobdaj, C., & Uchai, W. (2026). FEASIBILITY STUDY ON USING FNA TO COMPLEMENT TNA IN LANDMINE DETECTION BY MONTE CARLO SIMULATION. Suranaree Journal of Science and Technology, 19(2), 133–142. retrieved from https://ph04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/SUJST/article/view/13799

Issue

Section

Research Article