THE USE OF SSR MARKERS TO IDENTIFY HETEROTIC PATTERN OF F1 HYBRIDS IN TWO TROPICAL MAIZE POPULATIONS

Authors

  • Chuanchai Pongsai Faculty of Agriculture and Biotechnology, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming, Yunnan, China
  • Xue-Lin Tan Rice Research Institute, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming, Yunnan, China
  • Anek Silapapun Bangkok Seed Industry (CP Group) 97 Soi Yenchit Chand Road, Bangkok, Thailand
  • Pradit Suthipong Xiang Fan Chia Tai Agriculture Development, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
  • Luan Wei Rice Research Institute, Yunnan Agricultural University, Kunming, Yunnan, China

Keywords:

Maize, simple sequence repeats (SSR), population, heterosis, genetic distance (GD), marker assisted selection (MAS)

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to (i) select lines from two tropical maize populations using geneticdistance (GD) with 50 simple sequence repeats (SSR) markers for F1 hybrid production and (ii) studythe relationship between GD and yield and GD and mid-parent heterosis (MPH), using SSR markers.The results showed that the GD of the S1 selected lines from the two maize populations ranged from0.14 to 0.94, with the average of 0.44, which manifested the high genetic diversity among the S1 selectedlines. The grain yield of the F1 hybrids obtained from the crosses between the S1 selected lines of bothpopulations was evaluated. The mean grain yield of all F1 hybrids was 8,865 kgha-1. The F1 hybridsfrom the crosses between G2001 × Y1008 and G2068 × Y1002 gave the highest grain yields of 10,799kgha-1 and 10,721 kgha-1, respectively. The GD showed a positive correlation with the grain yield of theF1 hybrids and the MPH with the values of 0.21 and 0.07, respectively. However our research showed alow correlation between the GD and F1 hybrid grain yield and the MPH, because there was a differencein the linkage disequilibrium among the markers used and the quantitative trait loci (QTLs) betweenthe heterotic groups. This may be related to DNA markers being able to effectively predict hybridperformance with DNA heterozygosity. However the difference and number of markers studied mayhave also reflected the degree of correlation. The number of hybrids evaluated and the first generationof selfing in the lines studied may have also affected the value of the correlation.

References

Beck, D., Betrán, F.J., Bänziger, M., Willcox,M., and Edmeades, G.O. (1997). Fromlandrace to hybrid: strategies for the useof source populations and lines in thedevelopment of drought tolerant cultivars.In: Developing Drought and Low NTolerantMaize. Edmeades, G.O., Bänziger, M., Mickelson, H.R., and Peña-Valdivia, C.B. (eds.). Proceedings of aSymposium; Mar 25-29, 1996; CIMMYT,El Batán, Mexico, p. 369-382.

Bernardo, R. (1992). Relationship betweensingle-cross performance and molecularmarker heterozygosity. Theor. Appl.Genet., 83(5):628-634.

Betrán, F.J., Ribaut, J.M., Beck, D., andGonzalez de Leon, D. (2003). Geneticdiversity, specific combining ability andheterosis in tropical maize under stress andnon-stress environment. Crop Sci.,43:797-806.

Duvick, D.N. 1999. Heterosis: Feeding Peopleand Protecting Natural Resources. p.19-29. In J. G. Coors and S. Pandey (eds.).The Genetics and Exploitation ofHeterosis in Crops. American Society ofAgronomy, Inc., Crop Science Society ofAmerica, Inc., Soil Science Society ofAmerica, Inc., Madison, WI.

Goodman, M.M. (1985). Exotic maizegermplasm: Status, prospects, andremedies. Iowa State J. Res., 59:497-527.

Hallauer, A.R. (1991). Variation among full-sibfamilies of corn for different generationsof inbreeding. Crop Sci., 31:43-47.

Heckenberger, M., Melchinger, A.E., Ziegle,J.S., Joe, L.K., Hauser, J.D., Hutton, M.,and Bohn, M. (2002). Variation of DNAfingerprints among accessions withinmaize inbred lines with regard to theidentification of essentially derivedarieties. I. Genetic and technical sourcesof variation in SSR data. Mol. Breed.,10:181-191.

Jaccard, P. (1908). Nouvelles recherches sur ladistribution florale. Bull. Soc. Vaud. Sci.Nat., 44:223- 270

Lawrence, C.J., Harper, L.C., Schaeffer, M.L.,Sen, T.Z., Seigfried, T.E., and Campbell,D.A. (2008). MaizeGDB: The maizemodel organism database for basic,translational and applied research. Int. J.Plant Genomics., doi:10.1155/2008/496957.

Liu, X., Li, M.S., Li, X.H., and Huang, S.H.(2005). Genetic diversity of Chinesemaize OPVs determined by SSR analysisof bulk sample. Proceedings of the 9thAsian Regional Maize Workshop; Sept5-9, 2005; Beijing, China, p. 31-35.

Melchinger, A.E. (1999). Use of RFLP markersfor analyses of genetic relationshipsamong breeding materials and predictionof hybrid performance. p. 621–628. In:International Crop Science I. Buxton, D.R.(ed.). Crop Science Society of America,Madison, WI, p. 99-118.

Nei, M. (1972). Genetic distance between populations.Amer. Nat., 106:283-291.

Prasanna, A., Singode, A., Garg, A., Kumar, R.,and Singh, B.B. (2005). Molecularcharacterization of maize geneticresources in India. Proceedings of the9th Asian Regional Maize Workshop; Sept5-9, 2005, Beijing, China, p. 40-43.

Reif, J.C., Melchinger, A.E., Xia, X.C.,Warburton, M.L., Hoisington, D.A., Vasal,S.K., Srinivasan, G., Bohn, M., and Frisch,M. (2003). Genetic distance based onsimple sequence repeats and heterosis intropical maize populations. Crop Sci.,43:1,275-1,282.

Samphantarak, K. (2003). Plant breeding. 1st ed.Kasetsart Bangkok, p. 66-91.

Sam, R.E., Crosbie, T.M., Edwards, M.L.,Reiter, R.S., and Bull, J.K. (2007).Molecular markers in commercial breedingprogram. Crop Sci., 47:154-163.

SAS. (1997). SAS Proprietary Software Release6.12. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC.

Sharon, E.M., Kresovich, S., Jester, C.A.,Hernandez, C.J. and Szewc-McFadden,A.K. (1997). Application of multiplexPCR and fluorescence-based, semiautomatedallele sizing technology forgenotyping plant genetic resources. CropSci., 37:617-624.

Smith, J.S.C., Chin, E.C., Shu, L.H., Smith, O.S.,Wall, S.J., Senior, M.L., Mitchell, S.E.,Kresovich, S., and Ziegle, J. (1997). Anevaluation of utility of SSR loci asmolecular markers in maize (Zea mays L.):comparisons with data from RFLPs andpedigree. Theor. Appl. Genet., l 95:163-173.

Vasal, S.K., Cordova, H., Pandey, S., andSrinivasan, G. (1999). Tropical maize andheterosis. International Maize and WheatImprovement Center, M xico (M xico).In The Genetics and Exploitation ofHeterosis in Crops. An InternationalSymposium; International Maize andWheat Improvement Center, M xico City,M xico . August 17-22, 1997; p.19–29.

Xia, X.C., Reif, J.C., Melchinger, A.E., Frisch,M., Hoisington, D., Beck, A., Pixley, D.K.,and Warburton, M.L. (2005). GeneticDiversity among CIMMYT Maize inbredlines investigated with SSR markers: II.Subtropical, tropical midaltitude, andhighland maize inbred lines and theirrelationships with elite U.S. and Europeanmaize. Crop Sci., 45:2,573-2,582.

Yeh, F.C., Yang, R.C., and Boyle, T.J. (1999).Popgene Program Version 32. A jointProject Development by University ofAlberta and Centre for InternationalForestry Research, 29p..

Downloads

Published

2026-08-27

How to Cite

Pongsai, C., Tan, X.-L., Silapapun, A., Suthipong, P., & Wei, L. (2026). THE USE OF SSR MARKERS TO IDENTIFY HETEROTIC PATTERN OF F1 HYBRIDS IN TWO TROPICAL MAIZE POPULATIONS. Suranaree Journal of Science and Technology, 16(2), 175–184. retrieved from https://ph04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/SUJST/article/view/13515

Issue

Section

Research Article