EFFECT OF CASPUREA AS A PROTEIN SOURCE REPLACEMENT FOR SOYBEAN MEAL IN DIETS ON PERFORMANCE OF THAI NATIVE X BRAHMAN BEEF CATTLE

Authors

  • Kanin Bunnakit School of Animal Production Technology, Faculty of Agricultural Technology Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima, 30000, Thailand.
  • Pramote PaengKoum School of Animal Production Technology, Faculty of Agricultural Technology Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima, 30000, Thailand.
  • Wisitiporn Suksombat School of Animal Production Technology, Faculty of Agricultural Technology Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima, 30000, Thailand
  • Opart Pimpa Department of Bioindustry, Faculty of Technology and Management, prince of Songkla University, Surat Thani Campus, Khun Thalae, Surat Thani, 84100, Thailand.

Keywords:

Urea, Caspurea, soybean meal, Thai Native-Brahman beef cattle

Abstract

This experiment aimed to study the effects of Caspurea (cassava pulp-urea) on the productiveperformance of Thai Native × Brahman beef cattle. Four Thai Native × Brahman beef cattle (approximately365 days of age and average live weight of 154.7 ± 26.8 kg) were used in a 4 × 4 Latin squarearrangement of treatments with four 21-d periods. The treatments were the levels of Caspureareplacement for soybean meal in concentrate at 0, 25, 50, and 75%. Concentrates were formulated tocontain 14% CP and were fed at 2.0% BW. All animals were fed ad libitum urea-treated rice straw asroughage. The results showed that the total dry matter intake (5.5, 5.5, 5.2, and 5.3 kgDM/d; P > 0.05)was not significantly different from other dietary treatments. Dry matter digestibility (71.2, 72.1, 71.2,and 67.7%; P < 0.01) was the lowest in 75% replacement diet and ruminal ammonia-N concentration(8.5, 8.8, 9.5, and 13.3 mg%; P < 0.01) was the highest in 75 % replacement diet. Moreover, the totalvolatile fatty acid (127.4, 123.6, 119.8 and 96.4 mM; P < 0.01), the bacteria population [2.6, 2.5, 2.5and 2.4 (× 1010 cell/ml)], the protozoa population [2.2, 2.2, 2.1, and 1.9 (× 105 cell/ml)] and nitrogenabsorption (65.5, 64.7, 60.6, and 57.7 g/d) were also lowest in 75% replacement diet (P < 0.01), but werenot different from 0, 25, and 50% replacement groups. The nitrogen retention (%N intake) (24.1, 23.6,25.3, and 13.6 g/d) tended to increase in 50% replacement diet (P = 0.05) while, in 0, 25, and 50%replacement diet groups were not different. Blood urea nitrogen (22.5, 23.2, 23.3, and 24.6 mg%;P < 0.01) was the highest in 75% replacement diet and the average daily gain (0.54, 0.52, 0.55, and 0.42kg/d; P < 0.05) was linearly decreased by Caspurea replacement diet. These results indicate that 50%of the replacement diet by Caspurea for soybean meal in concentrate has positive effects on crossbredNative × Brahman beef cattle production.

References

AOAC. (1985). Official Methods of Analysis.Association of Official Chemists, Washington,D.C., 1,110p.

Bloomfield, R.A., Kearley, E.D., Creach, D.O.,and Muhrer, M.E. (1963). Ruminal pH andabsorption of ammonia and VFA. J. Anim.Sci., 22:833-839.

Briggs, P.K., Hogan, J.F., and Reid, R.L. (1957).The effect of volatile fatty acid, lactic acid,and ammonia on rumen pH in sheep. Aust.J. Agric. Res., 8:674-710.

Bromner, J.H. and Keeney, D.R. (1965). Steamdistillation medthodes of determination ofammonium, nitrate and nitrite. Annual.Chem. Acta., 32:485-495.

Coombe, J.B., Tribe, D.E., and Morrison, J.W.C.(1960). Some experimental observationson the toxicity of urea to sheep. AustralianJ. Agr. Res., 11:247.

Davis, G.V. and Stallcup, O.T. (1967). Effect ofsoybean meal, raw soybeans, corn glutenfeed, and urea on the concentration ofrumen fluid components at intervals afterfeeding. J. Dairy Sci., 50:1,638-1,645.

Davis, R.F., Woodhouse, N.S., Keeny, M., andBeck, G.H. (1957). The effect of variouslevels of dietary protein upon the volatilefatty acids in the rumen of the dairy cow.J. Dairy Sci., 40:75-83.

Freitag, R.R., Smith, W.H., and Beeson, W.M.(1968). Factors related to utilization of ureavs. protein nitrogen supplemented dietsby the ruminant. J. Anim. Sci., 27:478-485.

Goering, H.K. and Van Soet, P.J. (1970). Foragefiber analyses (apparatus, reagents,procedures, and some applications)Agric. Handbook No. 379. ARS-USDA,Washington, DC., 379p.

Haskins, B.R., Wise, M.B., Craig, H.B., andBarrick, E.R. (1967). Effect of levels ofprotein, source of protein and antibioticon performance, carcass characteristics,rumen environment and liver abscesses ofsteers fed all-concentrate rations. J. Anim.Sci., 26:430-437.

Helmer, L.G. and Bartley, E.E. (1971). Progressin the utilization of urea as a proteinreplacer for ruminants. A review. J. DairySci., 54:25-32.

Helmer, L.G., Bartley, E.E., and Dyoe, C.W.(1970). Feed processing. VI. Comparisonof starea, urea, and soybean meal asprotein source for lactating dairy cow.J. Dairy Sci., 53:883-887.

Herrera-Saldana, R., Huber, J.T., and Poore,M.H. (1989). Influence of varying proteinand starch degradabilities on performanceof lactating cows. J. Dairy Sci., 72:1,477-1,483.

Holter, J.B., Colovos, N.F., Clark, R.M., Koes,R.M., Davis, H.A., and Urban, W.E. Jr.(1971). Urea for lactating cattle. v. concentratefiber and urea in a corn silage-highconcentrate ration. J. Dairy Sci., 54:1,475-1,482.

Hutjens, M.F. and Schultz, L.H. (1971). Additionof soybeans or methionine analog to highconcentraterations for dairy cows. J. DairySci., 54:1,637-1,646.

Jittakot, S. (1999). Effect of cassarea as a proteinreplacement for soybean meal on feedintake, blood metabolites, ruminal fermentation,digestibility and microbial proteinsynthesis in dairy cows fed urea-treatedrice straw as a roughage, [MSc. thesis].Graduate School, Khon Kaen University,Khon Kaen, Thailand, 171p.

Jones, G.M., Stephens, C., and Kensett, B. (1974).Utilization of Starea, urea, or soybeanmeal in complete rations for lactatingdairy cows. J. Dairy Sci., 58:689-695.

Jouaney, J.P. and Ushida, K. (1999). The role ofprotozoa in feed digestion. Asian-Aust. J.Anim. Sci., 12:113-126.

Kim, C.H. (2001). Effect of different proteinsources given synchronously or asynchronouslyinto the rumen of consuming abeef cattle diet high in concentrate on thesynthesis of microbial protein. J. Anim. Sci.Technol., 43:831-840.

Kolver, E., Muller, L.D., Vaga, G.A., and Cassidy,T.J. (1998). Synchronization of ruminaldegradation of supplemental carbohydratewith pasture nitrogen in lactating dairycows. J. Dairy Sci., 81:2,017-2,028.

Roffler, R.E. and Satter, L.D. (1973). Influence ofration composition on ruminal ammoniaconcentration. J. Dairy Sci., 56:663. (Abstr.)

Roman-Ponce, H., Van Horn, H.H., Mashall,S.P., Wilcox, C.J., and Randel, P.F. (1974).Complete rations for dairy cattle. V. interactionof sugarcane bagasse quantity andform with soybean meal, urea, and Starea.J. Dairy Sci., 58:1,320-1,327.

SAS. (1996). SAS User’s Guide: Statistics.Version 6. 14th ed Cary, NC:SAS Inst.,474p.

Schmidt, S.O., Jorgensen, N.A., Benevenga, N.F.,and Benevenga, V.H. (1973). Comparisonof soybean meal, formaldehyde treatedsoybean meal, urea and Starea for steers.J. Anim. Sci., 37:1,233-1,237.

Shabi, K., Arieli, A., Bruckental, Aharoni, L.,Zamwel, Y.S., Bor, A., and Tagari., H.(1998). Effect of the synchronization ofthe degradation of dietary crude proteinand organic matter and feeding frequencyon ruminal fermentation and flow of digestain the abomasum of dietary cows. J. DairySci. 81:1,991-2,000.

Sinclair, L.A., Garnsworthy, P.C., Newbold, J.R.,and Buttery, P.J. (1993). Effect of synchronizingthe rate of dietary energy andnitrogen release on rumen fermentationand microbial protein synthesis in sheep.J. Agric. Sci. Camb., 120:251-263.

Sommart, K., Buttery, D.S., Rowlinson, P., andWannapat, M. (2000). Fermentationcharacteristics and microbial proteinsynthesis in an in vitro system usingcassava, rice straw and dried ruzi grass assubstrates. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci.,13:1,084-1,093.

Steel, R.G.D. and Torrie, J.H. (1980). Principlesand Procedures of Statistics with SpecialReference to the Biological Sciences: ABiometric Approach. 2nd ed. McGraw-HillBook Co., NY, 633p.

Stiles, D.A., Bartley, E.E., Meyer, R.M., Deyoe,C.W., and Pfost, H.B. (1970). Feed processing.VII. Effect of an expansion processedmixture of grain and urea (Starea) onrumen metabolism in cattle and on ureatoxicity. J. Dairy Sci., 53:1,436-1,441.

Susmel, P., Stefanon, B., Mills, C.R., and Candido,M. (1989). Change in amino acid compositionof different protein sources afterrumen incubation. Anim. Prod., 49:375-383.

Thompson, L.H., Wise, M.B., Harvey, R.W.,and Barrick, E.R. (1972). Starea, urea andsulfur in beef cattle rations. J. Anim. Sci.,35:474-482.

Whanger, P.D. and Matrone, G. (1966). Metabolismof lactic, succinic and acrylic acidsby rumen microorganisms for sheep fedsulfur-adequate and sulfur efficient diets.Biochimica et Biophysica Acta. 136:27.

Witt, M.W., Sinclair, L.A., Wilkinson, R.G., andButtery, P.J. (1999). The effects of synchronizingthe rate of dietary energy and nitrogensupply to the rumen on the productionand metabolism of sheep: food characterizationand growth and metabolism ofewe lambs given food ad libitum. Brit. Soc.Anim. Sci., 69:223-235.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-27

How to Cite

Bunnakit, K., PaengKoum, P., Suksombat, W., & Pimpa, O. (2026). EFFECT OF CASPUREA AS A PROTEIN SOURCE REPLACEMENT FOR SOYBEAN MEAL IN DIETS ON PERFORMANCE OF THAI NATIVE X BRAHMAN BEEF CATTLE. Suranaree Journal of Science and Technology, 15(1), 57–67. retrieved from https://ph04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/SUJST/article/view/13389

Issue

Section

Research Article