TRANSLATION, ADAPTATION AND PSYCHOMETRIC TESTING OF HINDI VERSION FOOT AND ANKLE OUTCOME SCALE IN INDIAN POPULATION

Authors

Keywords:

Ankle Injuries, Foot Injuries, Sprains and Strains, Translations

Abstract

This study cross-culturally adapted and translated the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) for the Indian population to assess the psychometric properties of the modified questionnaire. Components of the original version of FAOS were translated in Hindi and modified to ensure contextual appropriateness for Indian populations. Psychometric properties of the modified questionnaire were evaluated. For pilot testing, 30 Hindi-speaking participants with foot and ankle disorders were recruited. For testing construct validity of adapted FAOS, the Hindi version of foot and ankle disability index (FADI) was utilized. Test-retest reliability of the new version of FAOS was also tested. With a Scale-Content Validity Index average (SCVI/Ave) of 0.93 and a universal agreement (S-CVI/UA) of 0.90, the Hindi FAOS showed high content validity. An Expert committee validated the face validity of the study. A moderate correlation (r = 0.49, p < 0.001) between the Hindi version of the Foot and Ankle Disability Index (FADI) and construct validity was found. Reliability test had (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.980) and consistency (Single Measures ICC = 0.961, Average Measures ICC = 0.980, all p < 0.001). The Hindi translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the FAOS demonstrated validity and reliability, making it a valuable tool for assessing foot and ankle conditions in the Hindi-speaking population.

References

Balaji, G., Nema, S., & Kumar, A. (2020). A study on epidemiology of foot injuries in South Indian population at a tertiary care centre. International Journal of Research in Orthopaedics, 6(5), 1063–1069. https://doi.org/10.18203/issn.2455-4510.IntJResOrthop20203732

Beaton, D. E., Bombardier, C., Guillemin, F., & Ferraz, M. B. (2000). Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine, 25(24), 3186–3191. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014

Bland, J. M., & Altman, D. G. (1999). Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 8(2), 135–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/096228029900800204

Boateng, G. O., Neilands, T. B., Frongillo, E. A., Melgar-Quiñonez, H. R., & Young, S. L. (2018). Best practices for developing and validating scales for health, social, and behavioral research: A primer. Frontiers in Public Health, 6, Article 149. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149

Budiman-Mak, E., Conrad, K. J., Mazza, J., & Stuck, R. M. (2013). A review of the Foot Function Index and the Foot Function Index-Revised. Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, 6(1), Article 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/1757-1146-6-5

de Boer, A. S., Tjioe, R. J. C., van der Sijde, F., van der Vliet, Q. M., Kerkhoffs, G. M. M. J., & Haverkamp, D. (2017). The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot Scale: Translation and validation of the Dutch language version for ankle fractures. BMJ Open, 7(8), Article e017040. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017040

Eechaute, C., Vaes, P., Van Aerschot, L., Asman, S., & Duquet, W. (2007). The clinimetric qualities of patient-assessed instruments for measuring chronic ankle instability: A systematic review. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 8, Article 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-8-6

Golightly, Y. M., DeVellis, R. F., Nelson, A. E., Hannan, M. T., Lohmander, L. S., Renner, J. B., & Jordan, J. M. (2014). Psychometric properties of the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score in a community-based study of adults with and without osteoarthritis. Arthritis Care & Research, 66(3), 395–403. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.22162

Guillemin, F., Bombardier, C., & Beaton, D. (1993). Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: Literature review and proposed guidelines. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 46(12), 1417–1432. https://doi.org/10.1016/0895-4356(93)90142-N

Hale, S. A., & Hertel, J. (2005). Reliability and sensitivity of the Foot and Ankle Disability Index in subjects with chronic ankle instability. Journal of Athletic Training, 40(1), 35–40.

Hertzog, M. A. (2008). Considerations in determining sample size for pilot studies. Research in Nursing & Health, 31(2), 180–191. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.20247

Hsu, C.-C., & Sandford, B. A. (2007). The Delphi technique: Making sense of consensus. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 12(10), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.7275/pdz9-th90

Husted, J. A., Cook, R. J., Farewell, V. T., & Gladman, D. D. (2000). Methods for assessing responsiveness:

A critical review and recommendations. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 53(5), 459–468. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(99)00206-1

Lakey, E., & Hunt, K. J. (2019). Patient-reported outcomes in foot and ankle orthopaedics. Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics, 4(3), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/2473011419852930

Larsen, P., Rathleff, M. S., Roos, E. M., & Elsoe, R. (2023). Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS): Reference values from a national representative sample. Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics, 8(4), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/24730114231213369

Losina, E., Yang, H. Y., Deshpande, B. R., Katz, J. N., & Collins, J. E. (2017). Physical activity and unplanned illness-related work absenteeism: Data from an employee wellness program. PLOS ONE, 12(5), Article e0176872. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0176872

Lynn, M. R. (1986). Determination and quantification of content validity. Nursing Research, 35(6), 382–385. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006199-198611000-00017

Mokkink, L. B., Terwee, C. B., Knol, D. L., Stratford, P. W., Alonso, J., Patrick, D. L., Bouter, L. M., & de Vet, H. C. W. (2010). The COSMIN checklist for evaluating the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties: A clarification of its content. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 10, Article 22. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-10-22

Navarro-Flores, E., Losa-Iglesias, M. E., Becerro-de-Bengoa-Vallejo, R., Reina-Bueno, M., López-López, D., Romero-Morales, C., Palomo-López, P., & Calvo-Lobo, C. (2020). Cross-cultural adaptation, translation, and validation of the Spanish Foot and Ankle Outcome Score questionnaire. International Wound Journal, 17(5), 1384–1390. https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.13400

Negahban, H., Mazaheri, M., Salavati, M., Sohani, S. M., Askari, M., Falian, H., & Parnianpour, M. (2010). Reliability and validity of the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score: A validation study from Iran. Clinical Rheumatology, 29(5), 479–486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-009-1344-3

Popli, A., Goyal, K., Chatterjee, S., & Goyal, M. (2024). Validity and reliability of Hindi version of Foot and Ankle Disability Index in patients with chronic recurrent lateral ankle sprain. Foot and Ankle Surgery, 30(1), 27–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fas.2023.08.002

Roos, E. M., Brandsson, S., & Karlsson, J. (2001). Validation of the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score for ankle ligament reconstruction. Foot & Ankle International, 22(10), 788–794. https://doi.org/10.1177/107110070102201004

Tawade, M. J., & Kadam, S. (2023). Prevalence of posterior ankle impingement syndrome after ankle sprain in

fast bowlers. International Journal of Community Medicine and Public Health, 10(8), 2766–2769. https://doi.org/10.18203/2394-6040.ijcmph20232362

Terwee, C. B., Bot, S. D. M., de Boer, M. R., van der Windt, D. A. W. M., Knol, D. L., Dekker, J., Bouter, L. M., & de Vet, H. C. W. (2007). Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 60(1), 34–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012

Tsehay, Y. T., Endalew, H. L., Bogale, A. D., & Walle, T. A. (2023). Prevalence and associated factors of ankle-foot pain among nurses working in surgical units of comprehensive specialized hospitals in Amhara

Regional State, Northwest Ethiopia, 2022. Journal of Pain Research, 16, 2685–2696. https://doi.org/10.2147/JPR.S405417

van Bergen, C. J. A., Sierevelt, I. N., Hoogervorst, P., Waizy, H., van Dijk, C. N., & Becher, C. (2014). Translation

and validation of the German version of the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score. Archives of Orthopaedic

and Trauma Surgery, 134(7), 897–901. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-014-1994-8

Walsh, T. P., Merlo, G. B., Rutter, C., Abell, B., Platt, S. R., & Arnold, J. B. (2022). Cost-effectiveness of interventions for musculoskeletal foot and ankle conditions: A systematic review. Arthritis Care & Research, 74(4), 626–637. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.24514

World Medical Association. (2013). World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. JAMA, 310(20), 2191–2194. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2013.281053

Downloads

Published

2026-07-28

How to Cite

Manjusha, B., Tyagi, S., Sappra, A., Chabungbam, S., Bhati, P., & Anand, P. (2026). TRANSLATION, ADAPTATION AND PSYCHOMETRIC TESTING OF HINDI VERSION FOOT AND ANKLE OUTCOME SCALE IN INDIAN POPULATION. Suranaree Journal of Science and Technology, 33(3), 070110(1–9). retrieved from https://ph04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/SUJST/article/view/11177

Issue

Section

Research Article

Categories