SYMMETRY-ENHANCED NEURAL QUANTUM STATES FOR THE TRANSVERSE FIELD ISING MODEL

งานวิจัยนี้ใช้สถานะนิวรัลควอนตัมเชิงสมมาตร (Symmetric NQS) เพื่อคำนวณหาสถานะพื้นของแบบจำลองไอซิงในสนามแม่เหล็กตามขวางหนึ่งมิติ เราแสดงให้เห็นว่าการบังคับใช้สมมาตร Z2 ​ของระบบเป็นสิ่งจำเป็นอย่างยิ่งในการได้มาซึ่งผลลัพธ์ที่แม่นยำและมีเสถียรภาพ ซึ่งแก้ปัญหาที่แนวทาง NQS มาตรฐานล้มเหลวในระบบขนาดใหญ่ได้

Authors

  • Samak Boonpan -
  • Weerachai Sarakorn Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Khon Kaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55766/sujst10600

Keywords:

Neural Quantum States, Variational Monte Carlo, Transverse Field Ising Model, Spin-flip Symmetry, Quantum Many-Body Systems

Abstract

The quantum many-body problem presents a significant computational challenge due to the exponential scaling of the Hilbert space. In this work, we address this problem by applying Neural Quantum States (NQS) within a Variational Monte Carlo (VMC) framework to determine the ground state of the Transverse Field Ising Model (TFIM) in one dimension. We employ neural network architectures tailored to the system's dimensionality: a Feed-Forward Network for the 1D chain.  A key feature of our approach is the explicit enforcement of the global Z2 spin-flip symmetry of the Hamiltonian onto the NQS wavefunction, which restricts the search to the correct physical subspace.  We benchmark our results against exact diagonalization for systems of various sizes and model parameters. The calculated ground state energies show excellent agreement with the exact values, with relative errors falling in the range of 0.4% - 0.7%. This study demonstrates that tailored, symmetric NQS are a powerful, accurate, and flexible tool for investigating quantum many-body systems.

References

Altland, A., & Simons, B. D. (2010). Condensed matter field theory (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511789984

Carleo, G., & Troyer, M. (2017). Solving the quantum many-body problem with artificial neural networks. Science, 355(6325), 602-606. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aag2302

Ceperley, D., Chester, G. V., & Kalos, M. H. (1977). Monte Carlo simulation of a many-fermion system. Physical Review B, 16(8), 3081-3099. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.16.3081

Choo, K., Carleo, G., Regnault, N., & Neupert, T. (2018). Symmetries and many-body localization with neural-network quantum states. Physical Review Letters, 121(16), 167204. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.167204

Cohen, T., & Welling, M. (2016). Group equivariant convolutional networks. In Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML 2016) (pp. 2990–2999). PMLR.

Deng, D. L., Li, X., & Das Sarma, S. (2017). Quantum entanglement in neural network states. Physical Review X, 7(2), 021021. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.7.021021

Dutta, A., Aeppli, G., Chakrabarti, B. K., Divakaran, U., Rosenbaum, T. F., & Sen, D. (2015). Quantum phase transitions in transverse field spin models: From statistical physics to quantum information. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107706057

Feynman, R. P. (1982). Simulating physics with computers. International Journal of Theoretical Physics, 21, 467-488. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02650179

Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., & Courville, A. (2016). Deep learning. MIT Press.

Griffiths, D. J., & Schroeter, D. F. (2018). Introduction to quantum mechanics (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Kingma, D. P., & Ba, J. (2014). Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1412.6980

Lanczos, C. (1950). An iteration method for the solution of the eigenvalue problem of linear differential and integral operators. Journal of Research of the National Bureau of Standards, 45(4), 255-282. https://doi.org/10.6028/jres.045.026

LeCun, Y., Bottou, L., Bengio, Y., & Haffner, P. (1998). Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition. Proceedings of the IEEE, 86(11), 2278-2324. https://doi.org/10.1109/5.726791

McMillan, W. L. (1965). Ground state of liquid He4. Physical Review Journals Archive, 138(2A), A442-A451. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.138.A442

Mehta, P., Bukov, M., Wang, C. H., Day, A. G. R., Richardson, C., Fisher, C. K., & Schwab, D. J. (2019). A high-bias, low-variance introduction to machine learning for physicists. Physics Reports, 810, 1-124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2019.03.001

Metropolis, N., Rosenbluth, A. W., Rosenbluth, M. N., Teller, A. H., & Teller, E. (1953). Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines. The Journal of Chemical Physics, 21(6), 1087-1092. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1699114

Nomura, Y., Darmawan, A. S., Yamaji, Y., & Imada, M. (2017). Restricted Boltzmann machine learning for solving strongly correlated quantum systems. Physical Review B, 96(20), 205152. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.96.205152

Pfeuty, P. (1970). The one-dimensional Ising model with a transverse field. Annals of Physics, 57(1), 79–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4916(70)90270-8

Sachdev, S. (2011). Quantum phase transitions (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511973765

Saito, H., & Kato, M. (2018). Machine learning technique to find quantum many-body ground states of bosons on a lattice. Journal of the Physical Society of Japan, 87(1), 014001. https://doi.org/10.7566/JPSJ.87.014001

Sandvik, A. W. (2010). Computational studies of quantum spin systems. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1297(1), 135-338. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3518900

Schollwöck, U. (2011). The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states. Annals of Physics, 326(1), 96-192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aop.2010.09.012

Sharir, O., Levine, Y., Wies, N., Carleo, G., & Shashua, A. (2020). Deep autoregressive models for the efficient variational simulation of many-body quantum systems. Physical Review Letters, 124(2), 020503. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.020503

Smolensky, P. (1986). Information processing in dynamical systems: Foundations of harmony theory. In D. E. Rumelhart & J. L. McClelland (Eds.), Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition (Vol. 1, pp. 194–281). MIT Press.

Sorella, S. (2007). Weak-binding electrons in a trapped Fermi gas. Physical Review B, 75(18), 180519(R).

Stinchcombe, R. B. (1973). Ising model in a transverse field. Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics, 6(15), 2459. https://doi.org/10.1088/0022-3719/6/15/009

Suzuki, S., Inoue, J., & Chakrabarti, B. K. (2013). Quantum Ising phases and transitions in transverse Ising models (Lecture Notes in Physics, Vol. 862). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33039-1

White, S. R. (1992). Density matrix formulation for quantum renormalization groups. Physical Review Letters, 69(19), 2863-2866. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.69.2863

Downloads

Published

2026-06-04

How to Cite

Boonpan, S., & Sarakorn, W. (2026). SYMMETRY-ENHANCED NEURAL QUANTUM STATES FOR THE TRANSVERSE FIELD ISING MODEL: งานวิจัยนี้ใช้สถานะนิวรัลควอนตัมเชิงสมมาตร (Symmetric NQS) เพื่อคำนวณหาสถานะพื้นของแบบจำลองไอซิงในสนามแม่เหล็กตามขวางหนึ่งมิติ เราแสดงให้เห็นว่าการบังคับใช้สมมาตร Z2 ​ของระบบเป็นสิ่งจำเป็นอย่างยิ่งในการได้มาซึ่งผลลัพธ์ที่แม่นยำและมีเสถียรภาพ ซึ่งแก้ปัญหาที่แนวทาง NQS มาตรฐานล้มเหลวในระบบขนาดใหญ่ได้. Suranaree Journal of Science and Technology, 33(2), 030377(1–8). https://doi.org/10.55766/sujst10600