Enhancing Machinery Maintenance in the Gold Manufacturing Industry: Strategies for Overcoming Barriers and Integrating Sustainability
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59796/jcst.V15N3.2025.115Keywords:
employee training, fuzzy VIKOR machinery maintenance, maintenance barriers, proactive maintenance, risk assessment, spare parts management, sustainability in manufacturingAbstract
Effective machinery maintenance is critical for ensuring operational efficiency and productivity in the gold manufacturing industry. However, several barriers hinder maintenance practices, including insufficient employee accountability, limited availability of spare parts, and inadequate financial planning. This study investigates strategies to overcome these challenges and enhance maintenance processes. Risk factors were identified through a comprehensive literature review and expert consultations, and then analysed using the Fuzzy VIKOR method a multi-criteria decision-making tool that addresses complexity and uncertainty. The research highlights key barriers and proposes proactive measures for improving maintenance performance. Furthermore, the integration of sustainability principles into maintenance operations is emphasized to support economic, environmental, and social objectives. The findings underscore the importance of employee training, spare parts management, and financial planning in achieving effective and sustainable maintenance practices. This study provides valuable insights for industry professionals and decision-makers seeking to optimize machinery maintenance in the gold manufacturing sector.
References
Alarcón, M., Martínez-García, F. M., & de León Hijes, F. C. G. (2021). Energy and maintenance management systems in the context of industry 4.0. Implementation in a real case. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 142, Article 110841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.110841
Awasthi, A., Chauhan, S. S., & Goyal, S. K. (2010). A fuzzy multicriteria approach for evaluating environmental performance of suppliers. International Journal of Production Economics, 126(2), 370-378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2010.04.029
Bhandari, D., Singh, R. K., & Garg, S. K. (2019). Prioritisation and evaluation of barriers intensity for implementation of cleaner technologies: Framework for sustainable production. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 146, 156-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.02.038
Fei, L., Deng, Y., & Hu, Y. (2019). DS-VIKOR: A new multi-criteria decision-making method for supplier selection. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems, 21, 157-175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40815-018-0543-y
Franciosi, C., Voisin, A., Miranda, S., Riemma, S., & Iung, B. (2020). Measuring maintenance impacts on sustainability of manufacturing industries: from a systematic literature review to a framework proposal. Journal of Cleaner Production, 260, Article 121065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121065
Ighravwe, D. E., & Oke, S. A. (2022). Selection of outsourcing relationship for a maintenance system using fuzzy axiomatic design principles and fuzzy VIKOR. Engineering Access, 8(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.14456/mijet.2022.1
Jahan, A., & Edwards, K. L. (2013). VIKOR method for material selection problems with interval numbers and target-based criteria. Materials & Design, 47, 759-765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2012.12.072
Koppiahraj, K., Bathrinath, S., & Saravanasankar, S. (2021). A fuzzy VIKOR approach for selection of ergonomic assessment method. Materials Today: Proceedings, 45, 640-645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.02.725
Marimuthu, R., Sankaranarayanan, B., & Karuppiah, K. (2023). Prioritizing the factors affecting the occupational health and safety of workers in the mining industry using the SWARA technique. Journal of Current Science and Technology, 13(1), 59-73. https://doi.org/10.14456/jcst.2023.6
Marimuthu, R., Sankaranarayanan, B., Ali, S. M., de Sousa Jabbour, A. B. L., & Karuppiah, K. (2021). Assessment of key socio-economic and environmental challenges in the mining industry: Implications for resource policies in emerging economies. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 27, 814-830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.02.005
Opricovic, S., & Tzeng, G. H. (2004). Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. European Journal of Operational Research, 156(2), 445–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00020-1
Rathi, R., Singh, M., Sabique, M., Al Amin, M., Saha, S., & Krishnaa, M. H. (2022). Identification of total productive maintenance barriers in Indian manufacturing industries. Materials Today: Proceedings, 50, 736-742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.05.222
Velmurugan, K., Saravanasankar, S., Venkumar, P., & Pandian, R. S. (2022). Digital transformation in the context of maintenance management systems in SMEs: Critical factors and empirical effects. Journal of Current Science and Technology, 12(3), 428-438. https://doi.org/10.14456/jcst.2022.33
Wan, S., Li, D., Gao, J., Roy, R., & Tong, Y. (2017). Process and knowledge management in a collaborative maintenance planning system for high value machine tools. Computers in Industry, 84, 14-24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2016.11.002
Wienker, M., Henderson, K., & Volkerts, J. (2016). The computerized maintenance management system: An essential tool for world class maintenance. Procedia Engineering, 138, 413-420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.02.100
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Journal of Current Science and Technology
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
