A BWM-TOPSIS Linear Programming Model for Evaluating the Performance of Health-Promoting Hospitals with McKinsey 7s Framework in Organizational Management

Authors

  • Amin Lawong Faculty of Engineering, Ubon Ratchathani University, Ubon Ratchathani, 34190, Thailand
  • Arpakorn Kejornrak Health Consumer Protection and Pharmacy Department, Maha Sarakham Provincial Health Office, Maha Sarakham, 44000, Thailand
  • Nuchsara Kriengkorakot Faculty of Engineering, Ubon Ratchathani University, Ubon Ratchathani, 34190, Thailand
  • Preecha Kriengkorakot Faculty of Engineering, Ubon Ratchathani University, Ubon Ratchathani, 34190, Thailand

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59796/jcst.V14N2.2024.23

Keywords:

Health promoting hospital, Best-Worst Method, BWM, TOPSIS linear programming model, McKinsey 7s framework

Abstract

This research addresses the critical aspect of evaluating operational performance in health promotion hospitals, which play a vital role in providing medical services to local communities. The research proposes an integrated method for performance assessment, utilizing the Best-Worst Method (BWM) and the Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) linear programming model. Taking the case of health promotion hospitals in Maha Sarakham province, Thailand, and considering the McKinsey 7s framework's seven criteria, BWM is employed to determine the criteria weights. Subsequently, the TOPSIS linear programming model selects the ideal health promotion hospital based on these weights. The BWM analysis reveals criteria weights in the following order: system, staff, skill, style, structure, strategy, and shared value. The TOPSIS linear programming model identifies SH12 as the top-performing health promotion hospital with a closeness coefficient value of 0.8821. Additionally, a Spearman's rank correlation test validates this proposed method against the original TOPSIS approach, yielding a correlation value of 1.0. These findings provide valuable guidance for organizations, particularly in shaping strategic policies and resource allocation within medical service units, medical equipment, and personnel management in organizational settings. This study offers that the proposed method is simpler and will aid in the ongoing analysis of strengths and weaknesses in the improvement of organizations and development, helping organizations adapt to changes.

References

Abdel-Basset, M., Saleh, M., Gamal, A., & Smarandache, F. (2019). An approach of TOPSIS technique for developing supplier selection with group decision making under type-2 neutrosophic number. Applied Soft Computing, 77, 438-452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2019.01.035

Ahmad, Q. S., Khan, M. F., & Ahmad, N. (2023). A Group Decision-Making Approach in MCDM: An Application of the Multichoice Best–Worst Method. Applied Sciences, 13(12), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13126882

Akgül, E., Bahtiyari, M. İ., Kizilkaya Aydoğan, E., & Benli, H. (2021). Use of Topsis Method for Designing Different Textile Products in Coloration via Natural Source “Madder.” Journal of Natural Fibers, 19(14), 8993–9008. https://doi.org/10.1080/15440478.2021.1982106

Bachchhav, B., Bharne, S., Choudhari, A., & Pattanshetti, S. (2023). Selection of spot welding electrode material by AHP, TOPSIS, and SAW. Materials Today: Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2023.02.253

Bafail, O. A., & Abdulaal, R. M. S. (2022, January 12 - 14). A Combined BWM-TOPSIS Approach Versus AHP-TOPSIS Approach: An Application to Solid Waste Management [Conference presentation]. IEIM 2022, 2022 The 3rd International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Industrial Management. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3524338.3524343

Bertolini, M., Esposito, G., & Romagnoli, G. (2020). A TOPSIS-based approach for the best match between manufacturing technologies and product specifications. Expert Systems with Applications, 159, 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2020.113610

Chede, S. J., Adavadkar, B. R., Patil, A. S., Chhatriwala, H. K., & Keswani, M. P. (2021). Material selection for design of powered hand truck using TOPSIS. International Journal of Industrial and Systems Engineering, 39(2), 236- 249. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijise.2021.118257

Chin, K.-S., Pun, K.-F., & Lau, H. (2003). Development of a knowledge-based self-assessment system for measuring organisational performance. Expert Systems with Applications, 24(4),443–455. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0957-4174(02)00192-6

Chmielewska, M., Stokwiszewski, J., Markowska, J., & Hermanowski, T. (2022). Evaluating Organizational Performance of Public Hospitals using the McKinsey 7-S Framework. BMC Health Services Research, 22(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-07402-3

Cho, J., & Chae, M. (2022). Systematic Approach of TOPSIS Decision-Making for Construction Method Based on Risk Reduction Feedback of Extended QFD-FMEA. In Z. Wu (Ed.), Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2022,1-23. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1458599

Christian, A. V., Zhang, Y., & Salifou, C. K. (2016). Country Selection for International Expansion: TOPSIS Method Analysis. Modern Economy, 7(4), 470-476. https://doi.org/10.4236/me.2016.74052

Das, S. S., Chakraborti, P., Bhowmik, C., & Singh, R. (2019). Decision-Making for Selection of Most Suitable Materials for Biomedical Applications. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering, 901–917. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-6577-5_87

Dehghan-Manshadi, B., Mahmudi, H., Abedian, A., & Mahmudi, R. (2007). A novel method for materials selection in mechanical design: Combination of non-linear normalization and a modified digital logic method. Materials & Design, 28(1), 8–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2005.06.023

Demir, E., & Kocaoglu, B. (2019). The use of McKinsey s 7S framework as a strategic planning and economic assestment tool in the process of digital transformation. Pressacademia, 9(9), 114-119. https://doi.org/10.17261/pressacademia.2019.1078

Deng, H., Yeh, C.-H., & Willis, R. J. (2000). Inter-company comparison using modified TOPSIS with objective weights. Computers & Operations Research, 27(10), 963–973. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0305-0548(99)00069-6

Gokdeniz, I., Kartal, C., & Komurcu, K. (2017). Strategic Assessment based on 7S McKinsey Model for a Business by Using Analytic Network Process (ANP). International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(6), 342-353. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v7-i6/2967

Gupta, S., & Vijayvargy, L. (2021). Selection of Green Supplier in Automotive Industry: An Expert Choice Methodology. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 795(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/795/1/012036

Halicka, K. (2020). Technology Selection Using the TOPSIS Method. Foresight and STI Governance, 14(1), 85-96. https://doi.org/10.17323/2500-2597.2020.1.85.96

Hwang, C. L. & Yoon, K. (1981). Multiple Attribute Decision Making. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems. Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

Janati, A., Gholizadeh, M., Hajizadeh, A., & Bahreini, R. (2021). Factors Affecting Organization Performance Assessment: A Comprehensive Review. Health Technology Assessment in Action, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.18502/htaa.v4i2.6229

Jha, M. K., Gupta, S., Chaudhary, V., & Gupta, P. (2022). Material selection for biomedical application in additive manufacturing using TOPSIS approach. Materials Today: Proceedings, 62,1452-1457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.01.423

Jollyta, D., Oktarina, D., Gusrianty, Astri, R., Kadim, L. A. N., & Dasriani, N. G. A. (2021). Cluster Analysis Based on McKinsey 7s Framework in Improving University Services. Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Engineering Applications (JAIEA), 1(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.59934/jaiea.v1i1.45

Kheybari, S., Davoodi Monfared, M., Salamirad, A., & Rezaei, J. (2023). Bioethanol sustainable supply chain design: A multi-attribute bi-objective structure. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 180, 27-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2023.109258

Kheybari, S., Rezaie, F. M., & Farazmand, H. (2020). Analytic network process: An overview of applications. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 367, Article 124782. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2019.124780

Krawczyńska-Piechna, A. (2015). Application of TOPSIS Method in Formwork Selection Problem. Applied Mechanics and Materials, 797, 101-107. Trans Tech Publications, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.797.101

Lawong, A. (2023). A Hybrid BWM-MCLP Method for Selecting Emergency Medical Service Locations: A Case Study in Maha Sarakham Province, Thailand. Engineering Access, 9,102–108. https://doi.org/10.14456/MIJET.2023.13

Le Roux, D., Olivès, R., & Neveu, P. (2023). Combining entropy weight and TOPSIS method for selection of tank geometry and filler material of a packed-bed thermal energy storage system. Journal of Cleaner Production, 414, Article 137588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137588

Liang, F., Brunelli, M., & Rezaei, J. (2020). Consistency issues in the best worst method: Measurements and thresholds. Omega, 96, Article 102175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2019.102175

Liao, C.-N., Lin, C.-H., & Fu, Y.-K. (2015). Integrative Model for The Selection of a New Product Launch Strategy, Based On ANP, TOPSIS And MCGP: A Case Study. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 22(5), 715-737. https://doi.org/10.3846/20294913.2015.1074951

Mijalkovski, S., Efe, O. F., Despodov, Z., Mirakovski, D., & Mijalkovska, D. (2022). Underground Mining Method Selection with the Application of TOPSIS Method. GeoScience Engineering, 68(2), 125–133. https://doi.org/10.35180/gse-2022-0075

Motia, S., & Reddy, S. R. N. (2020). Application of TOPSIS method in selection of design attributes of decision support system for fertilizer recommendation. Journal of Information and Optimization Sciences, 41(7), 1689–1704. https://doi.org/10.1080/02522667.2020.1799513

Nilashi, M., Mardani, A., Liao, H., Ahmadi, H., Manaf, A. A., & Almukadi, W. (2019). A Hybrid Method with TOPSIS and Machine Learning Techniques for Sustainable Development of Green Hotels Considering Online Reviews. Sustainability, 11(21), Article 6013. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11216013

Odeh, G. (2021). Implementing Mckinsey 7S Model of Organizational Diagnosis and Planned Change, Best Western Italy Case Analysis. Journal of International Business and Management, 11(4), 01-08. https://doi.org/10.37227/jibm-2021-09-1438

Office of Primary Health System Support Ministry of Public Health. (2023). Health Resource Information System Primary care unit. Retrieved October 10, 2023, from http://gishealth.moph.go.th/pcu/admin/report.php

Özer, A. S., Hasani, H., Genç, E. B., Kutlu, N., Temur, G. T., & Sivri, Ç. (2020). Using Best Worst Method for Location Selection of Piezoelectric Tiles. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering, 27-34. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62784-3_3

Pamučar, D., Ecer, F., Cirovic, G., & Arlasheedi, M. A. (2020). Application of Improved Best Worst Method (BWM) in Real-World Problems. Mathematics, 8(8), Article 1342. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8081342

Pokpermdee, P., & Mekbunditkul, T. (2020). Level Categorization of Sub-district Health Promoting Hospitals in Thailand, Journal of Health Science, 29(2), 323–331.

Ponhan, K., & Sureeyatanapas, P. (2022). A comparison between subjective and objective weighting approaches for multi-criteria decision making: A case of industrial location selection. Engineering and Applied Science Research, 49(6), 763–771.

Putra, A. P. E., Sardi, I. L., & Adityaji, R. (2022, November 22-23). Implementation of Hybrid BWM-TOPSIS Method in the Selection of Tour Guide (Case Study: Guidemu) [Conference presentation]. 2022 1st International Conference on Software Engineering and Information Technology (ICoSEIT). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/icoseit55604.2022.10030070

Radwan, N. M., Elstohy, R., & Hanna, W. K. (2021). A Proposed Method for Multi-Criteria Group Decision Making: An Application to Site Selection. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 35(7), 505–519. Informa UK Limited. https://doi.org/10.1080/08839514.2021.1901031

Raj, A., & Srivastava, S. K. (2018). Sustainability performance assessment of an aircraft manufacturing firm. Benchmarking: International Journal, 25(5), 1500-1527. https://doi.org/10.1108/bij-01-2017-0001

Rezaei, J. (2015). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method. Omega, 53, 49–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2014.11.009

Saaty, R. W. (1987). The analytic hierarchy process what it is and how it is used. Mathematical Modelling, 9(3-5), 161-176. https://doi.org/10.1016/0270-0255(87)90473-8

Saaty, T. L. (1995). The Analytic Hierarchy Process for Decision in a Complex World. RWS Publication, Pittsburgh. PA: USA.

Sadjadi, S., & Karimi, M. (2018). Best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method: A robust approach. Decision Science Letters, 7(4), 323-340. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.dsl.2018.3.003

Salimi, N., & Rezaei, J. (2018). Evaluating firms’ R&D performance using best worst method. Evaluation and Program Planning, 66,147–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2017.10.002

Salvarli, M. S., & Kayiskan, D. (2018). An analysis of McKinsey 7-S model and its application on organizational efficiency. International Journal of Scientific and Technological Research, 4(7), 103-111.

Sharifi, F., Vahdatzad, M. A., Barghi, B., & Azadeh-Fard, N. (2022). Identifying and ranking risks using combined FMEA-TOPSIS method for new product development in the dairy industry and offering mitigation strategies: case study of Ramak Company. International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, 13(5), 2790–2807. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-022-01672-8

Somwethee, P., Aujirapongpan, S., & Ru-Zhue, J. (2023). The influence of entrepreneurial capability and innovation capability on sustainable organization performance: Evidence of community enterprise in Thailand. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 9(2), Article 100082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2023.100082

Sriburum, A., Wichapa, N., & Khanthirat, W. (2023). A Novel TOPSIS Linear Programming Model Based on the Taguchi Method for Solving the Multi-Response Optimization Problems: A Case Study of a Fish Scale Scraping Machine. Engineered Science, 23, Article 882. https://doi.org/10.30919/es882

Sureeyatanapas, P., Sriwattananusart, K., Niyamosoth, T., Sessomboon, W., & Arunyanart, S. (2018). Supplier selection towards uncertain and unavailable information: An extension of TOPSIS method. Operations Research Perspectives, 5, 69-79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orp.2018.01.005

To-on, P., Wichapa, N., & Khanthirat, W. (2023). A novel TOPSIS linear programming model based on response surface methodology for determining optimal mixture proportions of lightweight concrete blocks containing sugarcane bagasse ash. Heliyon, 9(7), e17755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17755

Vommi, V. (2017). TOPSIS with statistical distances: A new approach to MADM. Decision science letters, 6(1), 49-66. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.dsl.2016.8.001

Wang, Y., Liu, P., & Yao, Y. (2022). BMW-TOPSIS: A generalized TOPSIS model based on three-way decision. Information Sciences, 607, 799–818. Elsevier BV. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2022.06.018

Wiangkam, N., Jamrus, T., & Sureeyatanapas, P. (2022). The decision-making for selecting cold chain logistics providers in the food industry. Engineering and Applied Science Research, 49(6), 811–818.

Yadollahi, S., Kazemi, A., & Ranjbarian, B. (2018). Identifying and prioritizing the factors of service experience in banks: A Best-Worst method. Decision Science Letters, 7(4), 455-464. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.dsl.2018.1.002

Yildiz, A. (2019). Green supplier selection using topsis method: A case study from the automotive supply industry. Journal of Engineering Research and Applied Science, 8(2), 1146-1152.

Yoon, K., & Hwang, C.-L. (1995). Multiple Attribute Decision Making: An Introduction. 104, SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412985161

Downloads

Published

2024-05-02

How to Cite

Lawong, A., Kejornrak, A., Kriengkorakot, N., & Kriengkorakot, P. (2024). A BWM-TOPSIS Linear Programming Model for Evaluating the Performance of Health-Promoting Hospitals with McKinsey 7s Framework in Organizational Management. Journal of Current Science and Technology, 14(2), Article 23. https://doi.org/10.59796/jcst.V14N2.2024.23

Issue

Section

Research Article

Categories