Growth and Physiological Responses of Maize (Zea mays L.) under Drought Stress at Different Development Stages

Authors

  • Artit Pongtip Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Kasetsart University, Thailand
  • Pitipong Thobunluepop Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Kasetsart University, Thailand
  • Sutkhet Nakasathien Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Kasetsart University, Thailand
  • Pasajee Kongsil Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Kasetsart University, Thailand
  • Ed Sarobol Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Kasetsart University, Thailand
  • Wilasinee Chitbanchong Botany and Herbarium Research Group, Plant Varieties Protection Office, Department of Agriculture, Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives, Royal Thai Government, Bangkok, 10900, Thailand
  • Elke Pawelzik Department of Crop Science, Section of Quality of Plant Products, Georg – August Universität Göttingen, Germany

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59796/jcst.V14N1.2024.15

Keywords:

Crop Physiology, Corn Development Stages, Drought stress, Grain yield, Physiological responses, Maize

Abstract

Drought stress was a main problem of maize production in Thailand. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of drought stress at different development stages and maize varieties (Zea mays L.) on growth, physiological responses, and grain yield to maintain maize production. The experiment was arranged in split-plot in a Randomized Completely Block Design (RCBD) with four replications. The main plot was control (well-watered) and drought stress at different development stages (the vegetative phase (V5), before the reproductive phase (V12), and the grain filling phase (R3)). The sub-plot consisted of four maize varieties: TS1004, NS3, SW4452, and NK6248. Drought stress during the vegetative phase (V5) and before the reproductive phase (V12) was found to be a susceptible stage for maize because grain yield (GY) was decreased by the loss of crop growth rate (CGR) and total soluble sugar content (TSC) and it accumulated proline content. The NK6248 variety was found to be the most suitable for maize production because it had the highest grain yield (GY) and crop growth rate (CGR). In addition, it had low proline content (PC) under drought stress. In summary, under drought stress, it is advisable to select the NK6248 variety for crop production and avoid drought stress in the vegetative phase (V5) and before the reproductive phase (V12) because a mechanism by which maize could maintain its production of this study was the accumulation of total soluble sugar content to decrease proline content under drought stress condition.

Author Biographies

Artit Pongtip, Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Kasetsart University, Thailand

Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Kasetsart University, Thailand

Pitipong Thobunluepop, Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Kasetsart University, Thailand

Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Kasetsart University, Thailand

Sutkhet Nakasathien, Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Kasetsart University, Thailand

Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Kasetsart University, Thailand

Pasajee Kongsil, Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Kasetsart University, Thailand

Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Kasetsart University, Thailand

Ed Sarobol, Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Kasetsart University, Thailand

Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, Kasetsart University, Thailand

Wilasinee Chitbanchong, Botany and Herbarium Research Group, Plant Varieties Protection Office, Department of Agriculture, Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives, Royal Thai Government, Bangkok, 10900, Thailand

Botany and Herbarium Research Group, Plant Varieties Protection Office, Department of Agriculture, Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives, Royal Thai Government, Bangkok, 10900, Thailand

Elke Pawelzik, Department of Crop Science, Section of Quality of Plant Products, Georg – August Universität Göttingen, Germany

Department of Crop Science, Section of Quality of Plant Products, Georg – August Universität Göttingen, Germany 

References

Alam, M. R., Nakasathien, S., Sarobol, E., & Vichukit, V. (2014). Responses of physiological traits of maize to water deficit induced at different phenological stages. Agriculture and Natural Resources, 48(2), 183-196. https://li01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/anres/article/view/243247

Anjum, S., Tanveer, M., Ashraf, U., Hussain, S., Shahzad, B., Khan, I., & Wang, L. (2016). Effect of progressive drought stress on growth, leaf gas exchange, and antioxidant production in two maize cultivars. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 23(17), 17132-17141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-6894-8

Aslam, M., Maqbool, M. A., & Cengiz, R. (2015). Drought stress in maize (Zea mays L.): Effects, resistance mechanisms, global achievements and biological strategies for improvement. Switzerland: SpringerBriefs in Agriculture.

Bates, L. S., Waldren, R. P., & Teare, I. D. (1973). Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant and Soil, 39(1), 205-207. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00018060

Chandrasekar, V., K. Sairam, R., & Srivastava, G. C. (2000). Physiological and Biochemical Responses of Hexaploid and Tetraploid Wheat to Drought Stress. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 185(4), 219-227. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-037x.2000.00430.x

FAO. (2012). chapter 3: crop water needs. Retrieved from http://www.fao.org/3/s2022e/s2022e07.htm

Goswami, S. P., Dubey, A. N., Chourasia, A., Laxmi, S., & Singh, D. K. (2019). Water stress and its management strategies on rainfed maize: A review. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, 8(1), 2433-2438.

Hajibabaee, M., Azizi, F., & Zargari, K. (2012). Effect of drought stress on some morphological, physiological and agronomic traits in various foliage corn hybrids. American-Eurasian Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Sciences, 12(7), 890-896. https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.aejaes.2012.12.07.1751

Huang, C., Qin, A., Gao, Y., Ma, S., Liu, Z., Zhao, B., ... & Liu, Z. (2023). Effects of water deficit at different stages on growth and ear quality of waxy maize. Frontiers in Plant Science, 14, Article 1069551. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1069551

Irigoyen, J. J., Emerich, D. W., & Sanchez-Diaz, M. (1992). Water stress induced changes in concentrations of proline and total soluble sugars in nodulated alfalfa (Medicago sativa) plants. Physiologia plantarum, 84(1), 55-60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1992.tb08764.x

Rou, E. K. S., Zamri, A. N., & Sam, L. M. (2020). Effects of Drought Stress on the Growth, Yield and Physiological Traits of Thai Super Sweet Corn. Journal of Tropical Plant Physiology, 12(1), 11-11. https://doi.org/10.56999/jtpp.2020.12.1.3

Laskari, M., Menexes, G., Kalfas, I., Gatzolis, I., & Dordas, C. (2022). Water Stress Effects on the Morphological, Physiological Characteristics of Maize (Zea mays L.), and on Environmental Cost. Agronomy, 12(10), Article 2386. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12102386

Li, T., Hu, X., Wang, W., & Ma, W. (2017). Effect of water stress on proline and malonadialdehyde content in leaves of spring maize. Water Saving Irrigation, (6), 34-37.

Liu, C., Li, Z. T., Yang, K. J., Xu, J. Y., Wang, Y., Zhao, C. J., . . . Shi, X. X. (2015). Effects of water stress and subsequent rehydration on physiological characteristics of maize (zea mays) with different drought tolerance. Plant Physiology Journal, 51, 702-708. https://doi.org/10.13592/j.cnki.ppj.2015.0038

Molla, M. S. H., Nakasathien, S., Sarobol, E., & Vichukit, V. (2014). Growth and physiological responses to supra-optimal nitrogen and pre-anthesis drought stress in maize. Agriculture and Natural Resources, 48(5), 676-688. https://li01.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/anres/article/view/243397.

Nakhon Sawan Field Crops Research Center. (2017). Nakhon Sawan Agronomy Research Center News. Retrieved from https://nsfcrc-news.blogspot.com/2017/

Office of Agricultural Economics. (2019). Agricultural economy by product in 2022. Retrieved from https://www.oae.go.th/assets/portals/1/files/jounal/2566/commodity2565.pdf

Paquin, R., & Lechasseur, P. (1979). Observations sur la méthode de dosage de la praline livre dans less extraits de plantes. Canadian Journal of Botany, 57(18), 1851-1854. https://doi.org/10.1139/b79-233

Song, L., Jin, J., & He, J. (2019). Effects of severe water stress on maize growth processes in the field. Sustainability, 11(18), Article 5086. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11185086

Souza, T. C. D., Magalhães, P. C., Castro, E. M. D., Duarte, V. P., & Lavinsky, A. O. (2016). Corn root morphoanatomy at different development stages and yield under water stress. Pesquisa Agropecuária Brasileira, 51, 330-339. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-204X2016000400005

Watson, D. J. (1958). The Dependence of Net Assimilation Rate on Leaf-area Index. Annals of Botany, 22(85), 37-54. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/42907407

Williams, R. F. (1946). The Physiology of Plant Growth with Special Reference to the Concept of Net Assimilation Rate. Annals of Botany, 10(1), 41-72. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a083119

Downloads

Published

2023-12-06

How to Cite

Pongtip, A. ., Thobunluepop, P., Nakasathien, S. ., Kongsil, P. ., Sarobol, E., Chitbanchong, W., & Pawelzik, E. (2023). Growth and Physiological Responses of Maize (Zea mays L.) under Drought Stress at Different Development Stages. Journal of Current Science and Technology, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.59796/jcst.V14N1.2024.15

Issue

Vol. 14 No. 1 (2024): January - April

Section

Research Article

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Current Science and Technology

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.