An IoT-Enabled Cyber-Physical System Architecture with Adaptive Control: A Case Study in Household Bio-Fermentation

Authors

  • Laddawan Champa Automation and Robotic Technology Program, Faculty of Industrial Technology, Kanchanaburi Rajabhat University, Kanchanaburi 71190, Thailand
  • Nanthawan Hadthamard Modern Technology for Crop Management Program, Faculty of Science and Technology, Kanchanaburi Rajabhat University, Kanchanaburi 71190, Thailand
  • Natthaphong Thongpan Industrial Technology Program, Faculty of Industrial Technology, Kanchanaburi Rajabhat University, Kanchanaburi 71190, Thailand

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59796/jcst.V16N2.2026.186

Keywords:

cyber-physical systems, Internet of Things (IoT), adaptive control, bio-fermentation, smart agriculture

Abstract

The emergence of the Internet of Things (IoT) in Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS) has advanced real-time monitoring in smart agriculture; however, a critical gap exists in household bio-fermentation, where existing IoT-based systems lack adaptive mechanisms to manage the energy–stability trade-off under resource constraints. This study addresses this limitation by developing a three-layer IoT-enabled CPS architecture integrated with an optimization-guided adaptive scheduling algorithm that minimizes energy consumption while maintaining process stability above a γ threshold. Five 30-L fermenters were tested over 14 days under different headspace conditions using pH, temperature, and electrical conductivity sensors to evaluate physicochemical, microbiological, and reliability responses. The adaptive scheduling model reduced fermentation time by 30% while maintaining system availability above 95%, and the HS50 headspace condition yielded the most stable process behavior and the highest nutrient quality, meeting national organic fertilizer standards. The novelty lies in adapting optimization-based scheduling to resource-constrained household bio-fermentation and validating it against biological outcomes, thereby linking CPS reliability indicators with physicochemical and microbial performance. This work contributes theoretical insight into CPS optimization and offers a practical, scalable approach for sustainable smart agriculture.

References

Baicu, L. M., Andrei, M., Ifrim, G. A., & Dimitrievici, L. T. (2024). Embedded IoT design for bioreactor sensor integration. Sensors, 24(20), Article 6587. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24206587

Boyd, S., & Vandenberghe, L. (2004). Convex optimization. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804441

Camacho, E. F., & Bordons, C. (2007). Model predictive control (2nd ed.). London, UK: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-85729-398-5

Department of Agriculture. (2014). Organic fertilizer standards. Department of Agriculture. Retrieved from https://www.doa.go.th/ard/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/FEDOA11.pdf

Department of Land Development. (2022). Knowledge set for producing bio-fermented liquid. Retrieved from https://www.ldd.go.th/www/files/81827.pdf

Elalami, M., Baskoun, Y., Beraich, F. Z., Arouch, M., Taouzari, M., & Qanadli, S. D. (2019). Design and test of the smart composter controlled by sensors [Conference presentation]. 2019 7th International Renewable and Sustainable Energy Conference (IRSEC). IEEE, Agadir, Morocco. https://doi.org/10.1109/IRSEC48032.2019.9078197

Lanthier, M., & Peters, S. (2012). Microbial content of actively aerated compost tea after variations of ingredients or procedures [Conference presentation]. I World Congress on the Use of Biostimulants in Agriculture 1009. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2013.1009.26

Lee, E. A. (2008). Cyber physical systems: Design challenges [Conference presentation]. 2008 11th IEEE international symposium on object and component-oriented real-time distributed computing (ISORC), IEEE, Orlando, FL, USA. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISORC.2008.25

López, M., Martinez-Farre, X., Casas, O., Quilez, M., Polo, J., Lopez, O., ... & Girão, P. S. (2014). Intelligent composting assisted by a wireless sensing network. Waste Management, 34(4), 738-746. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2013.12.019

Musa, P., Sugeru, H., & Wibowo, E. P. (2024). Wireless sensor networks for precision agriculture: A review of NPK sensor implementations. Sensors, 24(1), Article 51. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24010051

Nitsuwat, S., Sanjaya, S. E., Wiratthikowit, S., & Kunathigan, V. (2013). The study of the biodiversity in local bio-fermented solution and the treatment of community wastewater at laboratory scale: Wastewater from restaurants [Conference presentation]. The 25th Annual meeting of the Thai society for biotechnology and international conference. Bangkok, Thailand.

Ojha, T., Misra, S., & Raghuwanshi, N. S. (2015). Wireless sensor networks for agriculture: The state-of-the-art in practice and future challenges. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 118, 66-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2015.08.011

Pérez-Borrero, I., Marín-Santos, D., Gegúndez-Arias, M. E., & Cortés-Ancos, E. (2020). A fast and accurate deep learning method for strawberry instance segmentation. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 178, Article 105736. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2020.105736

Rajkumar, R., Lee, I., Sha, L., & Stankovic, J. (2010,). Cyber-physical systems: The next computing revolution [Conference presentation]. Proceedings of the 47th design automation conference. California, US. https://doi.org/10.1145/1837274.1837461

Siti, F. Z., Elalami, M., Beraich, F. Z., Arouch, M., & Qanadli, S. D. (2021). Design and production of an autonomous rotary composter powered by photovoltaic energy. Arxiv Preprint ArXiv:2107.01993. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2107.01993

Smith, J. E. (2012). Bioprocess/fermentation technology. In Biotechnology (pp.49-72). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511802751.005

Srbinovska, M., Gavrovski, C., Dimcev, V., Krkoleva, A., & Borozan, V. (2015). Environmental parameters monitoring in precision agriculture using wireless sensor networks. Journal of Cleaner Production, 88, 297-307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.04.036

Verdouw, C., Sundmaeker, H., Tekinerdogan, B., Conzon, D., & Montanaro, T. (2019). Architecture framework of IoT-based food and farm systems: A multiple case study. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 165, Article 104939. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2019.104939

Yuan, J., Chadwick, D., Zhang, D., Li, G., Chen, S., Luo, W., ... & Peng, S. (2016). Effects of aeration rate on maturity and gaseous emissions during sewage sludge composting. Waste Management, 56, 403-410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.07.017

Zheng, G., Wang, Y., Wang, X., Yang, J., & Chen, T. (2018). Oxygen monitoring equipment for sewage-sludge composting and its application to aeration optimization. Sensors, 18(11), Article 4017. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18114017

Downloads

Published

2026-03-25

How to Cite

Champa, L., Hadthamard, N., & Thongpan, N. (2026). An IoT-Enabled Cyber-Physical System Architecture with Adaptive Control: A Case Study in Household Bio-Fermentation. Journal of Current Science and Technology, 16(2), 186. https://doi.org/10.59796/jcst.V16N2.2026.186