Energy Storage System Owner as a New Player in an Electricity Structure
Keywords:energy storage system, Temperature, production cost, virtual power plant, environment
Daily load demand causes different marginal cost at each hour due to different operation generation units. During peak load period, expensive generation units are determined to be turned on to provide sufficient electricity supply and sufficient spinning reserve. During light load period, generation units could not be unloaded due to their minimum up/down time, startup time and startup cost, causing uneconomic operation of the generating capacities. This excess capacity during light load period can be stored in the energy storage system (ESS) and the power can be released to supply the peak load demand hours to avoid turning on the next expensive unit which resulted in higher marginal cost. Performing as virtual power plant (VPP), ESS owners can seek for market opportunities to enter electric supply industry. This paper aims for proposing an optimal operation of VPP with charging/discharging ESS plan when marginal cost identifies real-time pricing (RTP) at each hour to be used as buying/selling price to VPP. Under strategically charging/discharging scheme, both parties, i.e., utility, and VPP, can achieve benefits in terms of better economic operation, lower system generation cost, increase operational income, while environmental impact is considered. The proposed method is tested on a ten-unit system under a centralized power market structure. Numerical results show that appropriate charging/discharging strategy could provide lower total production cost and offer opportunities for ESS owners as VPPs to obtain arbitrage marginal cost.
Amarendra, A., Srinivas, L. R., & Rao, R. S. (2022). Enhance power system security with FACTS devices based on Mayfly Optimization Algorithm. Journal of Current Science and Technology, 12(2), 162-210.
Chayakulkheeree, K., Intharasomchai, N., & Chhor, U. (2019, November 16-18). Probabilistic day-ahead optimal power dispatch using truncated normal distribution function considering price-based real-time demand response [Conference presentation]. The 42nd Electrical Engineering Conference of Thailand (EECON4). Nakhonratchasima, Thailand.
Hobbs, B. F., Rothkopf, M. H., O’Neill, R. P., & Chao, H. P. (2001). The next generation of electric power unit commitment models. Boston, MA.: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Nirukkanaporn, S., & Petcharaks, N. (2019a, March 6-8). A modified dynamic programing for generation scheduling –Environmental impact analysis for EV penetration [Conference presentation]. The 2019 International Electrical Engineering Congress (iEECON 2019). Hua Hin, Thailand. https://doi.org/10.1109/iEECON45304.2019.8939002
Nirukkanaporn, S., & Petcharaks, N. (2019b, March 19-23). Looking to the future: Thailand’s electric vehicles and the environment [Conference presentation]. The IEEE-PES GTD Grand international conference & exposition Asia 2019 (IEEE-PES GTD Asia 2019). Bangkok, Thailand. https://doi.org/10.1109/GTDAsia.2019.8715978
Ongsakul, W., & Dieu, V. N. (2013). Artificial intelligence in power system optimization. Boca, Raton, Fl.; CRC Press.
Ongsakul, W., & Petcharaks, N. (2004). Unit commitment by enhanced adaptive lagrangian relaxation. IEEE Trans. Power Systems, 19(1), 620-628. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPWRS.2003.820707
Petcharaks, N. (2006). An enhanced Lagrangian relaxation program for constrained hydrothermal generation scheduling [Doctoral Dissertation]. Asian Institute of Technology, Thailand.
Petcharaks, N. (2008, October 29-31). Multi-objective unit commitment [Conference presentation]. Electrical engineering conference 31, Srinakharinwirot University and Sripatum University, Nakorn Nayok, Thailand.
Petcharaks, N. (2014, November 13-21). Generation scheduling in electrical power system: A literature review [Conference presentation]. The 37th Electrical Engineering Conference 37 (EECON37). Khon kaen University, Thailand.
Petcharaks, N. (2015, November 3-6). Optimal spinning reserve under load and intermittent generation uncertainty using Monte Carlo simulation [Conference presentation]. IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Conference– IEEE ISGAT-Asia 2015. Bangkok, Thailand. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISGT-Asia.2015.7387056
Petcharaks, N., & Ongsakul, W. (2007). Hybrid enhanced Lagrangian relaxation and quadratic programming for hydrothermal scheduling. Electric Power Components & Systems, 35(1), 19-42. https://doi.org/10.1080/15325000600815449
Rehman, S., Al-Hadhrami, L. M., & Alam, M. M. (2015). Pumped hydro energy storage system: A technological review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 44, 586-598. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.12.040
Shareef, S. M., & Rao, R. S. (2022). Adaptive Grey Wolf based on Firefly algorithm technique for optimal reactive power dispatch in unbalanced load conditions. Journal of Current Science and Technology, 12(1), 11-31.
Sheble, G. B., & Fahd, G. N. (1994). Unit commitment literature synopsis. IEEE Transactions Power Systems, 9(1), 128-135. https://doi.org/10.1109/59.317549
Sikorski, T., Jasiński, M., Ropuszyńska-Surma, E., Węglarz, M., Kaczorowska, D., Kostyła, P., ... & Janik, P. (2019). A case study on distributed energy resources and energy-storage systems in a virtual power plant concept: Economic aspects. Energies, 12(23), Article 4447. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12234447
Sikorski, T., Jasiński, M., Ropuszyńska-Surma, E., Węglarz, M., Kaczorowska, D., Kostyla, P., ... & Solak, B. (2020). A case study on distributed energy resources and energy-storage systems in a virtual power plant concept: Technical aspects. Energies, 13(12), Article 3086. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13123086
Thongheet, A., Chimhat, T., & Petcharaks, N. (2010, December 1-3). Hydrothermal scheduling by mixed integer programming [Conference presentation]. The 33th Electrical Engineering Conference 33 (EECON33). Chiangmai, Thailand
Tseng, C. L., Oren, S. S., Cheng, C. S., Li, C., Svoboda, A. J., & Johnson, R. B. (1999). A transmission-constrained unit commitment method in power system scheduling. Decision Support Systems, 24(3-4), 297-310. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-9236(98)00072-4
Tunpaiboon, N. (2016). Thailand industry outlook 2016-18: Power generation industry. Krungsri Research. https://www.krungsri.com/bank/getmedia/4911f203-6f38-4a9a-acf6-d6bf744eb185/IO_Power_2016_EN.aspx
Velasquez, M. A., Torres-Perez, O., Quijano, N., & Cadena, A. (2019). Hierarchical dispatch of multiple microgrids using nodal price: An approach from consensus and replicator dynamics. Journal Mod Power System Clean Energy, 7(6), 1573-1584. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40565-019-0538-1
Wood, A. J., & Wollenberg, B. F. (2013). Power generation, operation & control. 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2023 Journal of Current Science and Technology
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.