Assessment of Climate Change Impact on the Streamflow in Mae Ngat Basin, Chiang Mai

Authors

  • Phattrawich Namracha Faculty of Engineering, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
  • Pheerawat Plangoen Faculty of Engineering, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
  • Thanaporn Supriyasilp Faculty of Engineering, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
  • Chana Sinsabvarodom Faculty of Engineering, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand

Keywords:

SWAT Model, Climate Change, General Circulation Model, Downscaling

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Climate change has significantly affected water resources worldwide, including Thailand. This is especially true for watershed areas, which are vital for agriculture and local water use. One such area is the Mae Ngat watershed in Chiang Mai Province, a tributary of the upper Ping River, where the Mae Ngat Somboon Chon Dam serves as the primary water reservoir. Studies over the past decade have shown that this region has experienced increasing variability in rainfall, in terms of frequency, intensity and timing. This has led in turn to flash floods during the rainy season and droughts during the dry season. Such climatic uncertainty has impacted streamflow, ecosystems, agriculture and the overall efficiency of water resource management in the basin. To address this uncertainty, the present study aimed to assess the impact of climate change on streamflow and inflow into the Mae Ngat reservoir using the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model. The analysis incorporated climate data from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6), which were spatially downscaled to a daily scale using the NASA Earth Exchange Global Daily Downscaled Projections (NEX-GDDP-CMIP6). This dataset is highly suitable for watershed-scale hydrological impact assessments and supports long-term water management planning under changing climatic conditions.

Methodology: The SWAT model was developed using input data, including topography, land use, soil characteristics and local meteorological records within the Mae Ngat watershed. The basin was subdivided into multiple sub-basins to enhance the spatial accuracy of hydrological process simulation. Model calibration and validation were performed using observed streamflow data from station P.56a during the period 2003–2014. Model performance was evaluated using statistical indicators, yielding R² of 0.80, NSE of 0.80, and PBIAS of -1.31%, indicating satisfactory agreement between the simulated and observed data and the model suitability for future projections. Future climate projections were obtained from 10 Global Climate Models (GCMs) under CMIP6. Four greenhouse gas emission scenarios were applied: SSP1-2.6, SSP2-4.5, SSP3-7.0 and SSP5-8.5. Daily downscaled data from NEX-GDDP-CMIP6 were used. Simulations covered two future periods: 2031–2050 and 2051–2070, with the historical baseline of 2003–2014. Streamflow outputs were analyzed on annual, monthly and spatial scales to assess changes and trends in water availability under different climate change scenarios.

Main Results: The projection results indicate that annual streamflow in the Mae Ngat watershed is expected to increase under all future climate scenarios. Notably, under SSP1-2.6 and SSP2-4.5, streamflow is projected to rise by approximately 54.07%–88.14% and 53.64%–76.32%, respectively. For SSP3-7.0, the projected increases are 35.79% and 70.91%, while SSP5-8.5 shows increases of 60.30% and 78.34% during the two future periods. Spatial analysis reveals that the central and lower parts of the watershed are mostly affected, with significant increases in streamflow that heighten the risk of flooding during the rainy season. Meanwhile, drought conditions remain a concern during the dry season due to the uneven distribution of rainfall throughout the year. Monthly-scale analysis shows that both SSP1-2.6 and SSP2-4.5 result in more evenly distributed increases in streamflow throughout the year, potentially reducing hydrological extremes. In contrast, SSP3-7.0 maintains dry-season streamflow levels close to the historical baseline, implying continued drought vulnerability. Additionally, SSP5-8.5 exhibits significant increases in streamflow during August and September, raising the likelihood of flash flood events. These contrasting seasonal patterns underscore the necessity of developing flexible and adaptive water resource management strategies to cope with both flood and drought risks under changing climate conditions.

Conclusions: Based on the SWAT model simulation using downscaled CMIP6 climate projections, streamflow in the Mae Ngat watershed is projected to increase during the period 2031–2070 under all greenhouse gas emission scenarios. Notably, SSP1-2.6 and SSP2-4.5 show a more consistent and evenly distributed increase in the streamflow throughout the year, while SSP3-7.0 and SSP5-8.5 exhibit higher variability, with increased flows during the rainy season and decreased flows during the dry season. These findings highlight a dual-risk scenario, i.e., flooding and drought, that may compromise the stability of the watershed's hydrological system. The calibrated SWAT model proves to be a reliable and effective tool for long-term water resource planning and management under future climate change conditions.

Practical Application: The results of the present study can be used as a policy-support tool for integrated and adaptive water resource management in the Mae Ngat watershed. Recommended strategies include enhancing reservoir capacity through structural improvements or supplementary storage facilities to handle peak rainfall; proper designs of effective drainage systems to mitigate flash flood risks in downstream areas are also recommended. Seasonal water allocation planning and promotion of water-efficient agriculture during the dry season are also essential. The integration of weather monitoring systems, predictive models and information technology can support strategic decision-making in such terms as crop scheduling, smart irrigation systems and early warning mechanisms. The presented framework and findings can also be applied to other watersheds in Thailand with similar hydrological and climatic characteristics, contributing to national resilience against future climate variability.

References

Novruzova, A. 2022. Climate change impacts on water resources. Teka Komisji Politologii i Stosunków Miedzynarodowych, 16, 23–35. https://doi.org/10.17951/teka.2021.16.2.23-35

Srinivasan, G., Agarwal, A. and Bandara, U. 2024. Climate change impacts on water resources and agriculture in Southeast Asia with a focus on Thailand, Myanmar, and Cambodia (pp. 17–32), in N. Khare (Ed.), The Role of Tropics in Climate Change, Elsevier, Amsterdam. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-99519-1.02002-0

Royal Irrigation Department. 2023. Supporting Document for the Evaluation of Public Sector Management Quality Development at Mae Faek–Mae Ngat Operation and Maintenance Project, Fiscal Year 2023 [Online]. Available: https://water.rid.go.th/waterm/template/manager/ProjectP&MQA66.html. [5 April 2024] (In Thai)

Upper Northern Region Irrigation Hydrology Center, Monthly and Annual Rainfall Statistics [Online]. Available: https://hydro-1.net/. [24 July 2024] (In Thai)

Arnold, J.G., Srinivasan, R., Muttiah, R.S. and Williams, J.R. 1998. Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment part I: Model development. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 34, 73–89. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.1998.tb05961.x

Chen, H., Sun, J., Lin, W. and Xu, H. 2020. Comparison of CMIP6 and CMIP5 models in simulating climate extremes. Science Bulletin, 65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scib.2020.05.015

Taylor, K.E., Stouffer, R.J. and Meehl, G.A. 2012. An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 93, 485–498. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-11-00094.1

Eyring, V., Bony, S., Meehl, G.A., Senior, C.A., Stevens, B., Stouffer, R.J. and Taylor, K.E. 2016. Overview of the coupled model intercomparison project phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization. Geoscientific Model Development, 9, 1937–1958. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1937-2016

Isared, K. and Ekasit, K. 2023. Impact of climate change on water balance in Lam Siao Basin using SWAT+ model. Journal of the Thai Society of Agricultural Engineering, 29, 14–24. https://doi.org/10.14416/j.tsaej.2023.08.296 (In Thai)

Saimai, H., Ketvara, S. and Jutithep, V. 2023. Impacts of climate change on streamflow in Tapi River Basin using SWAT model. The Journal of KMUTNB, 33, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.14416/j.kmutnb.2023.07.005 (In Thai)

Chen, C., Gan, R., Feng, D., Yang, F. and Zuo, Q. 2022. Quantifying the contribution of SWAT modeling and CMIP6 inputting to streamflow prediction uncertainty under climate change. Journal of Cleaner Production, 364, 132675. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132675

Sun, J., Yan, H., Bao, Z. and Wang, G. 2022. Investigating impacts of climate change on runoff from the Qinhuai River by using the SWAT model and CMIP6 scenarios. Water, 14, 1778. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14111778

Thrasher, B., Wang, W., Michaelis, A., Melton, F., Lee, T. and Nemani, R. 2022. NASA global daily downscaled projections, CMIP. Scientific Data, 9, 262. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-022-01393-4

Hydro-Informatics Institute (Public Organization), Data Collection and Analysis of the Ping River Basin under the 25 Basins Information System and Flood-drought Modeling Project [Online]. Available: https://tiwrm.hii.or.th/web/attachments/25basins. [25 August 2024] (In Thai)

Royal Irrigation Department, Mae Kuang Udom Thara Dam Project Information [Online]. Available: http://eimp.rid.go.th/maekuang/ข้อมูลโครงการ/. [7 March 2025] (In Thai)

Office of Agricultural Economics, Ministry of Agriculture and Cooperatives, Economic Crops and Agricultural Overview of Chiang Mai Province [Online]. Available: https://www.opsmoac.go.th/chiangmai-dwl-files-441291791395. [2 September 2024] (In Thai)

Neitsch, S.L., Arnold, J.G., Kiniry, J.R. and Williams, J.R. 2011. Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) Theoretical Documentation Version 2009, Texas Water Resources Institute, Texas A&M University System, Texas.

Arnold, J.G., Kiniry, J.R., Srinivasan, R., Williams, J.R., Haney, E.B. and Neitsch, S.L. 2012. SWAT Input/Output Documentation Version 2012, Texas Water Resources Institute.

Saxton, K.E. and Rawls, W.J. 2006. Soil water characteristic estimates by texture and organic matter for hydrologic solutions. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 70, 1569-1578. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj2005.0117

Land Development Department, Clay Soil in Thailand [Online]. Available: https://www.ldd.go.th/Web_Soil/clay.htm. [7 March 2024](In Thai)

Winchell, M., Srinivasan, R., di Luzio, M.D. and Arnold, J.G. 2013. ArcSWAT Interface for SWAT2012: User’s Guide, Blackland Research and Extension Center, Texas A&M AgriLife Research, Texas.

Geo-Informatics and Space Technology Development Agency (GISTDA), 2018, Waterline [Feature Layer] [Online]. Available: https://gistdaportal.gistda.or.th/portal/home/item.html?id=f8a82f947d1240889a729b1930fd458a. [25 August 2024]

Office of the National Water Resources (ONWR), 2021, Shape File of the 22 Watersheds as Defined by the Royal Decree B.E. 2564 (2021) [Online]. Available: http://www.onwr.go.th/?page_id=9893. [25 August 2024]

Shrestha, B., Babel, M. S., Maskey, S., van Griensven, A., Uhlenbrook, S., Green, A. and Akkharath, I. 2013. Impact of climate change on sediment yield in the Mekong River Basin: A case study of the Nam Ou Basin, Lao PDR. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 17, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-1-2013

Wuttichaikitcharoen, P., Plangoen, P. and Muangthong, S. 2016. Study of runoff simulation in Huai Luang watershed using SWAT. CRMA Journal, 14, 145–158. (In Thai)

Abbaspour, K.C., 2015, SWAT-CUP: SWAT Calibration and Uncertainty Programs-A User Manual, Eawag, Zurich.

Moriasi, D.N., Arnold, J.G., Liew, M., Bingner, R.L., Harmel, R.D. and Veith, T.L. 2007. Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. Transactions of the ASABE, 50, 885–900.

Moriasi, D.N., Gitau, M.W., Pai, N. and Daggupati, P. 2015. Hydrologic and water quality models: Performance measures and evaluation criteria. Transactions of the ASABE, 58, 1763–1785. https://doi.org/10.13031/trans.58.10715

Santhi, C., Arnold, J.G., Williams, J.R., Dugas, W.A., Srinivasan, R. and Hauck, L.M. 2001. Validation of the SWAT model on a large river basin with point and nonpoint sources. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 37, 1169–1188. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2001.tb03630.x

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), 2021, Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [V. Masson-Delmotte et al.] [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157896. [6 July 2024]

Try, S. and Qin, X. 2024. Evaluation Of future changes in climate extremes over Southeast Asia using downscaled CMIP6 GCM projections. Water, 16, 2207. https://doi.org/10.3390/w16152207

Fang, G.H., Yang, J., Chen, Y.N. and Zammit, C. 2015. Comparing bias correction methods in downscaling meteorological variables for a hydrologic impact study in an arid area in China. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 19, 2547–2559. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-19-2547-2015

Panneerselvam, B., Charoenlerkthawin, W., Ekkawatpanit, C., Namsai, M., Bidorn, B., Saravanan, S. and Lu, X.X. 2024. Climate change influences on the streamflow and sediment supply to the Chao Phraya River Basin, Thailand. Environmental Research, 251, 118638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2024.118638

Petpongpan, C., Ekkawatpanit, C., Viessri, S. and Kosigtittiwong, D. 2021. Projection of hydro-climatic extreme events under climate change in Yom and Nan River Basins, Thailand. Water, 13, 665. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13050665

Satriagasa, M.C., Tongdeenok, P. and Kaewjampa, N. 2023. Assessing the implication of climate change to forecast future flood using SWAT and HEC-RAS model under CMIP5 climate projection in upper Nan Watershed, Thailand. Sustainability, 15, 5276. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15065276

Sharma, D. and Babel, M.S. 2013. Application of downscaled precipitation for hydrological climate-change impact assessment in the upper Ping River Basin of Thailand. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 27, 1745–1760. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-013-0700-y

Downloads

Published

2025-09-23

How to Cite

Namracha, P., Plangoen, P., Supriyasilp, T., & Sinsabvarodom, C. (2025). Assessment of Climate Change Impact on the Streamflow in Mae Ngat Basin, Chiang Mai. Science and Engineering Connect, 48(3), 194–232. retrieved from https://ph04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/SEC/article/view/9571

Issue

Section

Research Article