The editor will appoint qualified persons to consider the quality of all articles, at least 2 people who have expertise directly or related to the content of the article and are not stakeholders with the author of the article. The evaluation by the experts is double blinded, that is, the names of the author of the article are concealed from the reviewers, and the authors does not know the name of the reviewers.
In order to ensure accurate academic communication and comply with international publishing standards, the ethics of publishing research results have been established for the operation of the journal. All parties involved must strictly comply with the principles and ethical standards in publishing according to their roles and duties as follows:

Author's Role
1. The author's work must be a work that has never been published anywhere before.
2. The author must refer to the work of others. If any text is used in one's own work, including a reference document must be made at the end of the article.
3. The author must write the article correctly according to the format specified in the Journal of the Thai Ceramic Society.
4. All authors whose names appear in the article must be those who have participated in the actual research conduct.
5. Authors must not copy the works of others and must always refer to the works of others when presenting or referencing in their own articles.
6. The author must agree to transfer the copyright to the journal before publication and not to publish the work or publish it to other sources. After being published in the Journal of the Thai Ceramic Society.
7. If there is research in humans or animals. The author must attach a certificate of authorization to conduct research in humans or laboratory animals from the Human Research Ethics Review Committee or the Laboratory Animal Use Ethics Review Committee, as the case may be, and provide the certification number or code in the article.

Roles and Responsibilities of Editors
1. The editor is responsible for considering and reviewing all articles submitted for publication consideration with the journal by considering the content of the article in accordance with the goals and scope of the journal. This includes checking the quality of articles in the evaluation process and the quality of articles before publication.
2. Editors must use academic reasons to review every article without prejudice against the article and its authors on the subject of race, gender, religion, culture, politics, and affiliation of the author.
3. The editor must not have a stake in the author or a qualified person. Do not use articles or journals for business purposes or use them as their own academic works.
4. Editors must not modify or change the content of articles and the results of the evaluation of the experts, including not blocking or interfering with the information exchanged between the experts and the authors.
5. Editors must strictly follow the processes and procedures of the journal.

Roles and Duties of Reviewers
1. Reviewers must consider the quality of the article as the main consideration, consider the article under academic principles and reasons without prejudice or personal opinion, and have no benefits with the author.
2. Reviewers must not seek to exploit the academic works that they have evaluated.
3. Reviewers must be aware that they have the knowledge and understanding of the content of the academic works that are truly evaluated.
4. If the reviewers finds that the article being evaluated is a plagiarized article of other works, the reviewers must notify the editor immediately.
5. Reviewers must maintain the evaluation period according to the specified evaluation time frame, including not disclosing the information of the article to those who are not involved

The guidelines are taken and adapted from https://www.publicationethics.org/files/2008%20Code%20of%20Conduct.pdf by Thai Journal Citation Index Centre)